Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [commit] Document that case statement fall-through is intentional.
@ 2011-02-26 22:06 Michael Snyder
  2011-02-26 22:40 ` Mark Kettenis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2011-02-26 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 101 bytes --]

Tested with "set debug expression 1" -- and I'm telling you, it took me
a while to figure THAT out!


[-- Attachment #2: dump.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 932 bytes --]

2011-02-26  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@vmware.com>

	* expprint.c (dump_subexp_body_standard): Document that case
	statement is meant to fall through.

Index: expprint.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/expprint.c,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.50 expprint.c
--- expprint.c	1 Feb 2011 18:56:34 -0000	1.50
+++ expprint.c	26 Feb 2011 21:48:49 -0000
@@ -767,6 +767,7 @@ dump_subexp_body_standard (struct expres
     case TERNOP_SLICE:
     case TERNOP_SLICE_COUNT:
       elt = dump_subexp (exp, stream, elt);
+      /* FALL THROUGH */
     case BINOP_ADD:
     case BINOP_SUB:
     case BINOP_MUL:
@@ -803,6 +804,7 @@ dump_subexp_body_standard (struct expres
     case STRUCTOP_MEMBER:
     case STRUCTOP_MPTR:
       elt = dump_subexp (exp, stream, elt);
+      /* FALL THROUGH */
     case UNOP_NEG:
     case UNOP_LOGICAL_NOT:
     case UNOP_COMPLEMENT:

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [commit] Document that case statement fall-through is intentional.
  2011-02-26 22:06 [commit] Document that case statement fall-through is intentional Michael Snyder
@ 2011-02-26 22:40 ` Mark Kettenis
  2011-02-26 22:52   ` Michael Snyder
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2011-02-26 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: msnyder; +Cc: gdb-patches

> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:52:18 -0800
> From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
> 
> Tested with "set debug expression 1" -- and I'm telling you, it took me
> a while to figure THAT out!
> 
> 
> --------------070307060603090205010008
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>  name="dump.txt"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline;
>  filename="dump.txt"
> 
> 2011-02-26  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@vmware.com>
> 
> 	* expprint.c (dump_subexp_body_standard): Document that case
> 	statement is meant to fall through.
> 
> Index: expprint.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/expprint.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.50
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.50 expprint.c
> --- expprint.c	1 Feb 2011 18:56:34 -0000	1.50
> +++ expprint.c	26 Feb 2011 21:48:49 -0000
> @@ -767,6 +767,7 @@ dump_subexp_body_standard (struct expres
>      case TERNOP_SLICE:
>      case TERNOP_SLICE_COUNT:
>        elt = dump_subexp (exp, stream, elt);
> +      /* FALL THROUGH */

proper spelling is /* FALLTHROUGH */, at least that's what the classic
lint tool wants.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [commit] Document that case statement fall-through is intentional.
  2011-02-26 22:40 ` Mark Kettenis
@ 2011-02-26 22:52   ` Michael Snyder
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2011-02-26 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Kettenis; +Cc: gdb-patches

Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:52:18 -0800
>> From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
>>
>> Tested with "set debug expression 1" -- and I'm telling you, it took me
>> a while to figure THAT out!
>>
>>
>> --------------070307060603090205010008
>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>>  name="dump.txt"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> Content-Disposition: inline;
>>  filename="dump.txt"
>>
>> 2011-02-26  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@vmware.com>
>>
>> 	* expprint.c (dump_subexp_body_standard): Document that case
>> 	statement is meant to fall through.
>>
>> Index: expprint.c
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/expprint.c,v
>> retrieving revision 1.50
>> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.50 expprint.c
>> --- expprint.c	1 Feb 2011 18:56:34 -0000	1.50
>> +++ expprint.c	26 Feb 2011 21:48:49 -0000
>> @@ -767,6 +767,7 @@ dump_subexp_body_standard (struct expres
>>      case TERNOP_SLICE:
>>      case TERNOP_SLICE_COUNT:
>>        elt = dump_subexp (exp, stream, elt);
>> +      /* FALL THROUGH */
> 
> proper spelling is /* FALLTHROUGH */, at least that's what the classic
> lint tool wants.

Thanks!



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-26 22:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-26 22:06 [commit] Document that case statement fall-through is intentional Michael Snyder
2011-02-26 22:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2011-02-26 22:52   ` Michael Snyder

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox