From: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4375789C.2030809@tausq.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8f2776cb0511112059u4c54acf1j13936c04fed3dbe6@mail.gmail.com>
> I don't know what state the test results from HPPA are in (please
> don't read any criticism in that), but I don't think we would need to
> tolerate any regressions from the change. What's a real threat to
> progress is if there are so many variations we care about that it
> becomes difficult to test.
Test Run By tausq on Wed Nov 9 07:48:22 2005
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== gdb Summary ===
# of expected passes 10813
# of unexpected failures 57
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 42
# of known failures 42
# of unresolved testcases 2
# of unsupported tests 3
HPUX is in much worse shape I'm afriad. I don't know the status of the
BSD port.
I believe we only have the following "actively" maintained configurations:
hppa-*-linux
hppa-*-openbsd
hppa-*-hpux*
hppa2.0w-*-hpux*
hppa64-*-hpux*
Which is still a lot, but not unmanagable yet. I somewhat actively
maintain and test the Linux port, and I can test the HPUX
configurations. I know nothing about BSD.
randolph
--
Randolph Chung
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports
http://www.tausq.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-12 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-09 23:55 Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10 1:27 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10 1:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10 1:32 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10 19:18 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-11 11:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-12 3:32 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 4:22 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 4:39 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 4:59 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 5:07 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 13:21 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 17:08 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-13 15:38 ` Randolph Chung [this message]
2005-11-13 18:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-19 19:15 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-13 18:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4375789C.2030809@tausq.org \
--to=randolph@tausq.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@red-bean.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox