From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>,
Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051113181708.GA3599@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4375789C.2030809@tausq.org>
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 01:07:40PM +0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> HPUX is in much worse shape I'm afriad. I don't know the status of the
> BSD port.
>
> I believe we only have the following "actively" maintained configurations:
>
> hppa-*-linux
> hppa-*-openbsd
> hppa-*-hpux*
> hppa2.0w-*-hpux*
> hppa64-*-hpux*
>
> Which is still a lot, but not unmanagable yet. I somewhat actively
> maintain and test the Linux port, and I can test the HPUX
> configurations. I know nothing about BSD.
This is where I have to ask...
Does anyone still use the HP/UX native aCC support? I'm talking
about hpacc-abi.c and the C++ bits of hpread.c. I don't think GNU C++
on HP/UX uses any of this code.
I currently have access to an HP/UX system, with both the GNU and HP
tools. I'm willing to go through and fix up the SOM support for the
GNU tools, but I think doing aCC would be a little more than I could
handle.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-13 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-09 23:55 Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10 1:27 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10 1:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10 1:32 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10 19:18 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-11 11:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-12 3:32 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 4:22 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 4:39 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 4:59 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 5:07 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 13:21 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 17:08 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-13 15:38 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-11-19 19:15 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-13 18:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051113181708.GA3599@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@red-bean.com \
--cc=randolph@tausq.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox