From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>,
Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051113181909.GB3599@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051112060426.GT1635@adacore.com>
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:04:26PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> I think this begs for an experiment, which I hope I'll be able to make
> sometime during the winter. I can start with the code we have, since
> we already have a lot of code that analyzes the prologue, and see how
> to reconstitute the information we would otherwise get from the unwind
> record.
If you're going to do this, I recommend using the prologue analysis
framework Jim posted, which hopefully we'll have merged by then. If we
haven't, well, an active user of it will make it easier.
> Randolph I think raised a very good point regarding the computation
> of the end of the prologue, though. I don't know if we can determine
> this without the help of the unwind record. For this, I don't have
> enough experience with that chip.
A good prologue analyzer may just want to go until it sees something
confusing. Depending on the peculiarities of the architecture, this
may be enough.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-13 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-09 23:55 Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10 1:27 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10 1:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10 1:32 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10 19:18 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-11 11:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-12 3:32 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 4:22 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 4:39 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 4:59 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 5:07 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 13:21 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 17:08 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-13 15:38 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-19 19:15 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-11-13 18:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051113181909.GB3599@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@red-bean.com \
--cc=randolph@tausq.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox