Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>,
	Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051113181909.GB3599@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051112060426.GT1635@adacore.com>

On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:04:26PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> I think this begs for an experiment, which I hope I'll be able to make
> sometime during the winter. I can start with the code we have, since
> we already have a lot of code that analyzes the prologue, and see how
> to reconstitute the information we would otherwise get from the unwind
> record.

If you're going to do this, I recommend using the prologue analysis
framework Jim posted, which hopefully we'll have merged by then.  If we
haven't, well, an active user of it will make it easier.

> Randolph I think raised a very good point regarding the computation
> of the end of the prologue, though. I don't know if we can determine
> this without the help of the unwind record. For this, I don't have
> enough experience with that chip.

A good prologue analyzer may just want to go until it sees something
confusing.  Depending on the peculiarities of the architecture, this
may be enough.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-13 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-09 23:55 Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10  1:27 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10  1:31   ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10  1:32     ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10 19:18 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-11 11:22   ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-12  3:32     ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12  4:22       ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12  4:39         ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12  4:59         ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12  5:07           ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 13:21             ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 17:08               ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-13 15:38                 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:27                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-19 19:15                     ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:23               ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:28                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-11-13 18:36                   ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:45                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051113181909.GB3599@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jimb@red-bean.com \
    --cc=randolph@tausq.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox