From: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
To: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 04:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f2776cb0511111838m64d478d9s2e04db338fbf7fc8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <437548AF.5090107@tausq.org>
On 11/11/05, Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org> wrote:
> How do you find the end of the prologue without consulting the unwind
> data? Right now one heuristic is "scan the code until you hit a branch",
> which works but might mean you scan way too much code. I'm also not
> certain if this will work correctly for things like alloca, but it might.
This is a question all the prologue analyzers have to answer. You can
either stop when you reach the current PC, or stop when you see an
instruction you don't recognize.
> For that matter, how do you find the beginning of the function without
> unwind data?
Linker symbols. If you don't have them, then prologue analysis isn't useful.
> OTOH, if you can combine all the prologue analysis code in hppa-tdep.c
> and make it more robust, I think it will certainly be a good thing.
In my experience, the new analysis framework (which I've kind of been
forgetting about for a while now) makes things a lot more robust. I
wrote it because I was getting fed up with corrupted backtraces
debugging GDB on the S/390. With the new framework, I got a
multi-page backtrace through optimized code the first time. It makes
a big difference.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-12 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-09 23:55 Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10 1:27 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10 1:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10 1:32 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10 19:18 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-11 11:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-12 3:32 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 4:22 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2005-11-12 4:39 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 4:59 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 5:07 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 13:21 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 17:08 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-13 15:38 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-19 19:15 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-13 18:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8f2776cb0511111838m64d478d9s2e04db338fbf7fc8@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jimb@red-bean.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=randolph@tausq.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox