From: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43728C6E.5010206@tausq.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051109203108.GX1635@adacore.com>
Joel,
> This is really for anybody's FYI, and maybe Randolph if he'd like to
> dig in some of the issues with me.
>
> This is something I'm still working on, so I haven't verified my theory
> just yet. But I think there is a confusion in the meaning of Save_SP
> in the unwind descriptor. The document I have says:
>
> 18. Save_SP (bit 27): One if the entry value of SP is saved by this
> regions entry sequence in the current frame marker (current_SP - 4);
> zero otherwise.
>
> It doesn't say that the frame has a frame base register. For this, we
> have another field:
Be careful here, some of this is to work around gcc's interpretation of
these fields, which does not always correspond to the documentation. gcc
only uses a few of the bits in the unwind record.
Dave Anglin (pa gcc maintainer) is the expert on these issues.
I only have a few minutes now, will respond in more detail to your two
messages later this evening.
thanks and I do hope to have a little more time to start looking at gdb
again.
randolph
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-09 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-09 23:55 Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10 1:27 ` Randolph Chung [this message]
2005-11-10 1:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10 1:32 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10 19:18 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-11 11:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-12 3:32 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 4:22 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 4:39 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 4:59 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 5:07 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 13:21 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 17:08 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-13 15:38 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-19 19:15 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-13 18:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43728C6E.5010206@tausq.org \
--to=randolph@tausq.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox