Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:27:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43728C6E.5010206@tausq.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051109203108.GX1635@adacore.com>

Joel,

> This is really for anybody's FYI, and maybe Randolph if he'd like to
> dig in some of the issues with me.
> 
> This is something I'm still working on, so I haven't verified my theory
> just yet. But I think there is a confusion in the meaning of Save_SP
> in the unwind descriptor. The document I have says:
> 
>     18. Save_SP (bit 27): One if the entry value of SP is saved by this
>         regions entry sequence in the current frame marker (current_SP - 4);
>         zero otherwise.
> 
> It doesn't say that the frame has a frame base register. For this, we
> have another field:

Be careful here, some of this is to work around gcc's interpretation of 
these fields, which does not always correspond to the documentation. gcc 
only uses a few of the bits in the unwind record.

Dave Anglin (pa gcc maintainer) is the expert on these issues.

I only have a few minutes now, will respond in more detail to your two 
messages later this evening.

thanks and I do hope to have a little more time to start looking at gdb 
again.

randolph


  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-09 23:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-09 23:55 Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10  1:27 ` Randolph Chung [this message]
2005-11-10  1:31   ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10  1:32     ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10 19:18 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-11 11:22   ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-12  3:32     ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12  4:22       ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12  4:39         ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12  4:59         ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12  5:07           ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 13:21             ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 17:08               ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-13 15:38                 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:27                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-19 19:15                     ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:23               ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:28                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-13 18:36                   ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:45                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43728C6E.5010206@tausq.org \
    --to=randolph@tausq.org \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox