From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051110001750.GB1635@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43728C6E.5010206@tausq.org>
> Be careful here, some of this is to work around gcc's interpretation of
> these fields, which does not always correspond to the documentation. gcc
> only uses a few of the bits in the unwind record.
Grumble.
Yes, I know. It's the reason why I never got around to submit the few
changes we made locally. Our GCC has some local changes that make the
unwind descriptor more compatible between the two models. I am still
asking the details to the hppa specialist at AdaCore, but it seems
that starting with GCC 3.4, the frame was setup in a more compatible
way already. If you're interested, I'll let you know the details of
our implementation.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-10 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-09 23:55 Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10 1:27 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10 1:31 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2005-11-10 1:32 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10 19:18 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-11 11:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-12 3:32 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 4:22 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 4:39 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 4:59 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 5:07 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 13:21 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 17:08 ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-13 15:38 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-19 19:15 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-13 18:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051110001750.GB1635@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=randolph@tausq.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox