Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:31:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051110001750.GB1635@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43728C6E.5010206@tausq.org>

> Be careful here, some of this is to work around gcc's interpretation of 
> these fields, which does not always correspond to the documentation. gcc 
> only uses a few of the bits in the unwind record.

Grumble.

Yes, I know. It's the reason why I never got around to submit the few
changes we made locally. Our GCC has some local changes that make the
unwind descriptor more compatible between the two models. I am still
asking the details to the hppa specialist at AdaCore, but it seems
that starting with GCC 3.4, the frame was setup in a more compatible
way already. If you're interested, I'll let you know the details of
our implementation.

-- 
Joel


  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-10  0:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-09 23:55 Joel Brobecker
2005-11-10  1:27 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10  1:31   ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2005-11-10  1:32     ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-10 19:18 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-11 11:22   ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-12  3:32     ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12  4:22       ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12  4:39         ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12  4:59         ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12  5:07           ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-12 13:21             ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-12 17:08               ` Jim Blandy
2005-11-13 15:38                 ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:27                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-19 19:15                     ` Randolph Chung
2005-11-13 18:23               ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:28                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-13 18:36                   ` Joel Brobecker
2005-11-13 18:45                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051110001750.GB1635@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=randolph@tausq.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox