From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7744 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2005 05:07:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7733 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Nov 2005 05:07:51 -0000 Received: from ip127.bb146.pacific.net.hk (HELO stl.com.hk) (202.64.146.127) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 05:07:51 +0000 Received: from rccomp.stl.com.hk ([192.168.100.200]) by stl.com.hk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EanZB-0001zZ-7Q; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:04:41 +0800 Message-ID: <4375789C.2030809@tausq.org> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:38:00 -0000 From: Randolph Chung User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050805) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy CC: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning References: <20051109203108.GX1635@adacore.com> <43735815.3070805@tausq.org> <20051111001017.GJ1635@adacore.com> <437548AF.5090107@tausq.org> <8f2776cb0511111838m64d478d9s2e04db338fbf7fc8@mail.gmail.com> <4375624D.1070202@tausq.org> <8f2776cb0511112022k746e7909r24be2e964dd45a13@mail.gmail.com> <437571F4.8020508@tausq.org> <8f2776cb0511112059u4c54acf1j13936c04fed3dbe6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8f2776cb0511112059u4c54acf1j13936c04fed3dbe6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00159.txt.bz2 > I don't know what state the test results from HPPA are in (please > don't read any criticism in that), but I don't think we would need to > tolerate any regressions from the change. What's a real threat to > progress is if there are so many variations we care about that it > becomes difficult to test. Test Run By tausq on Wed Nov 9 07:48:22 2005 Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 10813 # of unexpected failures 57 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 42 # of known failures 42 # of unresolved testcases 2 # of unsupported tests 3 HPUX is in much worse shape I'm afriad. I don't know the status of the BSD port. I believe we only have the following "actively" maintained configurations: hppa-*-linux hppa-*-openbsd hppa-*-hpux* hppa2.0w-*-hpux* hppa64-*-hpux* Which is still a lot, but not unmanagable yet. I somewhat actively maintain and test the Linux port, and I can test the HPUX configurations. I know nothing about BSD. randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/