Re: (gdb-6.8) Discard breakpoint address if shared library is unloaded

[Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>]

On Wednesday 20 February 2008 22:20:51 Nick Roberts wrote:
>  > So how about you submit a complete patch, following the usual protocol
>  > rather than an abbreviated one? I'll review it promptly, and we can
>  > put this episode behind us. As I said before, I reviewed the breakpoint.c
>  > patch and it looked fine, so it's just a matter of taking a look at
>  > the testsuite failures and adjust the testsuite accordingly (if
>  > justified).
> 
> Some or all of the other failures occur in these files:
> 
> 2007-09-23  Vladimir Prus  <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> 	
> 	* gdb.base/annota1.exp: Adjust for 'info break'
> 	format changes.
> 	* gdb.base/annota3.exp: Likewise.
> 	* gdb.base/break.exp: Likewise.
> 	* gdb.base/condbreak.exp: Likewise.
> 	* gdb.base/pending.exp: Likewise.
> 	* gdb.base/sepdebug.exp: Likewise.
> 	* gdb.base/unload.exp: Likewise.
> 	* gdb.base/ovldbreak.exp: Likewise.
> 
> 
> So I'm surprised that Vladimir did not know there would be more than those
> in ovldbreak.exp (actually cp.base).

In my email, I've actually said I did not run the other tests and 
there might be more failures.  Getting the complete list is only
possible by running the testsuite, since I have no idea what tests were
added since then.

> It is possible for me to try to understand each of these changes and revert
> them but clearly it is far easier for Vladimir to do that as he made the
> changes in the first place.
> 
> I will try to do that but I don't have the time at the moment.

So, given that we want to release 6.8 soon, and already spent considerable time
on this patch, it looks like I get to pick up where you left. I'll try to
update the test tomorrow.

- Volodya