Re: (gdb-6.8) Discard breakpoint address if shared library is unloaded

[Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>]

 > And I forgot. You can also avoid some code duplication by changing:
 > 
 > Index: breakpoint.c
 > ===================================================================
 > --- breakpoint.c	(revision 146)
 > +++ breakpoint.c	(working copy)
 > @@ -3506,7 +3506,7 @@ print_one_breakpoint_location (struct br
 >  	if (addressprint)
 >  	  {
 >  	    annotate_field (4);
 > -	    if (b->loc == NULL)
 > +	    if (b->loc == NULL || loc->shlib_disabled)
 >  	      ui_out_field_string (uiout, "addr", "<PENDING>");
 >  	    else if (header_of_multiple)
 >  	      ui_out_field_string (uiout, "addr", "<MULTIPLE>");

That's what I had originally
(http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2007-11/msg00262.html)

but Vladimir said:
(http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2007-11/msg00266.html)

  I believe that in a case of breakpoint with multiple locations, where
  the first location is shlib_disabled, the updated code will print <PENDING>
  as address, not <MULTIPLE>.

  I think the right approach would be moving the check for loc->shlib_disabled
  later, like this:
  ...

so I did this as he was the author of the original patch.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob