From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] fullname attribute for GDB/MI stack frames
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 13:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050504133936.GB10578@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01c5505e$Blat.v2.4$ae323100@zahav.net.il>
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 07:05:40AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 18:13:40 -0400
> > From: Christopher Faylor <me@cgf.cx>
> >
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to fix the fullpath machinery?
>
> The fullpath machinery is fine, it doesn't need any fixing.
>
> Please, let's not break something that works just because some test
> case doesn't seem 100% correct. Let's keep things in the right
> perspective here. The fullpath machinery was invented to let GDB
> process file names for its internal purposes, and it does its job
> well, because for those purposes, treating d:foo as absolute file
> names is _exactly_ right.
Huh? That's not true. xfullpath was created to avoid canonicalizing
certain file symlinks, not to change anything having to do with
absolute paths or directory links. Are you talking about some
different function?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-04 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-01 19:13 Dennis Brueni
2005-04-02 9:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-30 19:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-01 2:19 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-01 18:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-01 18:34 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-01 19:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-02 0:55 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-02 0:54 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-02 0:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-02 19:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-02 19:36 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-02 19:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-02 19:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-02 20:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-02 20:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-02 21:20 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-03 3:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 3:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 3:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-03 19:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 19:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-03 20:05 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-03 20:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 13:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 13:51 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 13:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 17:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 18:06 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 20:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 18:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 18:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 20:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 21:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 21:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 22:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 23:42 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-05 4:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 23:40 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-05 0:05 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 4:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 23:37 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-05 4:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 19:57 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-03 21:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 21:39 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-03 22:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-03 22:27 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 2:32 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 3:05 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 17:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 4:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 13:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 4:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 11:48 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 14:55 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 15:02 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 17:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 17:58 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 18:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 20:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 23:34 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-05 4:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 13:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 20:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 20:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 21:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 14:52 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 17:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 18:03 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 18:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 21:39 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-03 22:14 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 4:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 13:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-05-04 17:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 4:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 22:50 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 4:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-05 17:20 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 18:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-05 19:18 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-05 23:53 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 16:22 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 16:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-05 16:46 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 17:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-18 4:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-05 15:15 Dennis Brueni
2005-05-05 15:25 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 15:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-05 15:32 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-02 14:22 Dennis Brueni
2005-05-02 19:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-01 15:09 Dennis Brueni
2005-03-29 20:43 Dennis Brueni
2005-03-30 4:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-01 1:41 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-26 13:43 Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-26 13:50 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-24 20:49 Dennis Brueni
2005-03-23 22:22 Dennis Brueni
2005-03-23 22:34 ` Bob Rossi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050504133936.GB10578@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox