Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] fullname attribute for GDB/MI stack frames
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 16:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050505162233.GD31111@white> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050501021945.GA19962@white>

> Well, I do understand your point here but I'd prefer that all fullname
> checks ensure that the path be absolute. The more I think about it, I
> should probably make a variable called 'fullname_output' in the
> testsuite that contains the regex output of a fullname. How does this
> sound?
> 
> > > As promised, here is an updated patch set with the regex
> > > changes you suggested, plus checking for a little more directory
> > > information with respect to the fullname path, to the extent
> > > that we can be sure the test case still passes in all environments.
> > 
> > I don't think adding fullname= to the -i=mi2 output is a good idea; MI2
> > is supposed to be stable.  Bob, what do you think?  Anyone else?
> 
> As far as i understand, it is acceptable to add new fields to a stable
> version of MI. It is the parsers responsibility to ignore MI fields that
> they are unfamiliar with. I also understand that it is acceptable to add 
> new commands to an MI version. Making either of the 2 changes above does 
> not effect the version number of the MI release (AFAIK). 
> 
> With that said, I'm not quite sure what model Andrew had in mind
> when releasing the MI versions. Here is 2 possibilities, 
> 
> Originally there is mi-. Once it becomes stable it is released as mi2-.
> mi2- is never touched again, accept for bug fixes. All development and 
> new features is done on mi-. When mi- becomes stable again it is turned 
> into mi3-.
> 
> Originally there is mi-. Once it becomes stable it is released as mi2-.
> Any changes compatible with the MI2 protocol should be merged into the 
> mi- and mi2- testcases. Changes that are not compatible with mi2 should 
> be merged into mi-. When mi- becomes stable enough it could be moved 
> into mi3-.
> 
> I prefer the second model. I think it is more flexible and would allow
> for features to get into the MI protocol faster.

Ping, any decision on this? I need to know if I should be modifing mi2
testcases or just mi?

Thanks,
Bob Rossi


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-05 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-01 19:13 Dennis Brueni
2005-04-02  9:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-30 19:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-01  2:19   ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-01 18:24     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-01 18:34       ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-01 19:02         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-02  0:55           ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-02  0:54       ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-02  0:58         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-02 19:30         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-02 19:36           ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-02 19:52             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-02 19:55               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-02 20:42                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-02 20:49                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-02 21:20                     ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-03  3:49                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03  3:42                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03  3:46                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-03 19:36                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 19:49                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-03 20:05                             ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-03 20:49                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 13:34                               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 13:51                                 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 13:52                                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 17:51                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 18:06                                     ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 20:32                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 18:05                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 18:32                                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 20:53                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 21:07                                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 21:42                                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 22:01                                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 23:42                                             ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-05  4:15                                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 23:40                                         ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-05  0:05                                           ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05  4:02                                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 23:37                                       ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-05  4:05                                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 19:57                           ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-03 21:15                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 21:39                               ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-03 22:14                                 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04  4:08                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 13:39                                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 17:49                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04  4:18                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 21:39                               ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-03 22:24                                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-03 22:27                                   ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04  2:32                                     ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04  3:05                                       ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 17:42                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04  4:12                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 13:00                                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04  4:27                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 11:48                                   ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 14:55                                     ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 15:02                                       ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 17:43                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 17:58                                         ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 18:29                                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 20:39                                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 23:34                                             ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-05  4:08                                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 13:45                                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 20:20                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 20:30                                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 21:24                                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 14:52                                   ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 17:48                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 18:03                                       ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 18:26                                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 22:50                           ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04  4:04                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-05 17:20       ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 18:04         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-05 19:18         ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-05 23:53           ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 16:22     ` Bob Rossi [this message]
2005-05-05 16:26       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-05 16:46         ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 17:17           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-18  4:44   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-05 15:15 Dennis Brueni
2005-05-05 15:25 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 15:28   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-05 15:32     ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-02 14:22 Dennis Brueni
2005-05-02 19:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-01 15:09 Dennis Brueni
2005-03-29 20:43 Dennis Brueni
2005-03-30  4:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-01  1:41 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-26 13:43 Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-26 13:50 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-24 20:49 Dennis Brueni
2005-03-23 22:22 Dennis Brueni
2005-03-23 22:34 ` Bob Rossi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050505162233.GD31111@white \
    --to=bob@brasko.net \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox