From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] fullname attribute for GDB/MI stack frames
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 03:49:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c54f92$Blat.v2.4$f64406c0@zahav.net.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050502212043.GE22967@white> (message from Bob Rossi on Mon, 2 May 2005 17:20:43 -0400)
> Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 17:20:43 -0400
> From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
>
> The question is, will GDB will return \abc or d:foo from source.c:openp?
Yes.
> I see that IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH is being used, which specifically says it
> allows the case \abc and d:foo.
Exactly.
> So, the next question is, does xfullpath change \abc or d:foo into a
> real absolute path or not?
It can't do anything with \abc (except perhaps convert it into /abc,
but that's not a given). For d:foo, it converts it into d:./foo,
which is still not 100% absolute, but xfullpath cannot do anything
about it, since it doesn't know how to resolve "." (i.e., what was the
cwd at the time of the compilation).
> Notice the comment in utils.c:3021
>
> #ifdef HAVE_DOS_BASED_FILE_SYSTEM
> /* We need to be careful when filename is of the form 'd:foo', which
> is equivalent of d:./foo, which is totally different from d:/foo. */
> if (strlen (dir_name) == 2 && isalpha (dir_name[0]) && dir_name[1] == ':')
> {
> dir_name[2] = '.';
> dir_name[3] = '\000';
> }
> #endif
>
> That above comment broke my brain :)
If you mean that it isn't clear, let me know and I will try to
clarify.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-03 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-01 19:13 Dennis Brueni
2005-04-02 9:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-30 19:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-01 2:19 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-01 18:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-01 18:34 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-01 19:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-02 0:55 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-02 0:54 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-02 0:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-02 19:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-02 19:36 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-02 19:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-02 19:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-02 20:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-02 20:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-02 21:20 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-03 3:49 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-05-03 3:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 3:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-03 19:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 19:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-03 20:05 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-03 20:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 13:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 13:51 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 13:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 17:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 18:06 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 20:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 18:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 18:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 20:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 21:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 21:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 22:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 23:42 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-05 4:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 23:40 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-05 0:05 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 4:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 23:37 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-05 4:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 19:57 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-03 21:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 21:39 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-03 22:14 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 4:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 13:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 17:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 4:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 21:39 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-03 22:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-03 22:27 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 2:32 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 3:05 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 17:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 4:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 13:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 4:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 11:48 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 14:55 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 15:02 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 17:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 17:58 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 18:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 20:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 23:34 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-05 4:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 13:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 20:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 20:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-04 21:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 14:52 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 17:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-04 18:03 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-04 18:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-03 22:50 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-04 4:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-05 17:20 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 18:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-05 19:18 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-05-05 23:53 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 16:22 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 16:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-05 16:46 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 17:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-18 4:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-05 15:15 Dennis Brueni
2005-05-05 15:25 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-05 15:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-05 15:32 ` Bob Rossi
2005-05-02 14:22 Dennis Brueni
2005-05-02 19:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-01 15:09 Dennis Brueni
2005-03-29 20:43 Dennis Brueni
2005-03-30 4:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-01 1:41 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-26 13:43 Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-26 13:50 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-24 20:49 Dennis Brueni
2005-03-23 22:22 Dennis Brueni
2005-03-23 22:34 ` Bob Rossi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01c54f92$Blat.v2.4$f64406c0@zahav.net.il' \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox