From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10636 invoked by alias); 4 May 2005 13:39:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10561 invoked from network); 4 May 2005 13:39:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 May 2005 13:39:37 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DTK6C-0002wQ-RS for ; Wed, 04 May 2005 09:39:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 13:39:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] fullname attribute for GDB/MI stack frames Message-ID: <20050504133936.GB10578@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <01c54f57$Blat.v2.4$4c163500@zahav.net.il> <20050502204859.GA6090@nevyn.them.org> <01c54f91$Blat.v2.4$f6e0b160@zahav.net.il> <20050503034604.GA437@nevyn.them.org> <01c55017$Blat.v2.4$3cb51f20@zahav.net.il> <20050503195650.GD25356@white> <01c55025$Blat.v2.4$00e755e0@zahav.net.il> <20050503213943.GG25356@white> <20050503221340.GD16440@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <01c5505e$Blat.v2.4$ae323100@zahav.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c5505e$Blat.v2.4$ae323100@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00110.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 07:05:40AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 18:13:40 -0400 > > From: Christopher Faylor > > > > Wouldn't it make more sense to fix the fullpath machinery? > > The fullpath machinery is fine, it doesn't need any fixing. > > Please, let's not break something that works just because some test > case doesn't seem 100% correct. Let's keep things in the right > perspective here. The fullpath machinery was invented to let GDB > process file names for its internal purposes, and it does its job > well, because for those purposes, treating d:foo as absolute file > names is _exactly_ right. Huh? That's not true. xfullpath was created to avoid canonicalizing certain file symlinks, not to change anything having to do with absolute paths or directory links. Are you talking about some different function? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC