From: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <npd723j4lc.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20011127131600.tSQxK93gPygOEAOO9qyW-j-9LP629aqWydGJ6aDHdSI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011127020634.A10010@nevyn.them.org>
These are two independent fixes, right? I understand GDB may need
them both before it works correctly; I'm asking if each of them is a
correct change in its own right. If so, could you show me a test case
that each change fixes?
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> 2001-11-26 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
>
> * values.c (value_primitive_field): Add embedded_offset to the
> address of structure members.
> * gnu-v3-abi.c (gnuv3_rtti_type): Cast to base type before
> attempting to access vtable pointer. Set using_enc_p if we cast.
> (gnuv3_virtual_fn_field): Call value_cast with structure rather than
> structure pointer. Cast to base type before attempting to access
> vtable pointer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-27 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-13 9:24 Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-13 9:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-13 9:34 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-26 18:25 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-26 21:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-13 21:56 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-14 22:09 ` Jim Blandy
2001-11-27 12:48 ` Jim Blandy
2001-11-26 18:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-13 18:02 ` Jim Blandy
2001-11-14 9:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-14 22:39 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2001-11-14 22:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-27 13:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-21 13:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-22 13:53 ` Jim Blandy
2001-11-30 11:42 ` Jim Blandy
2001-11-29 22:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-30 8:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-21 17:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-30 8:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-21 23:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-27 13:16 ` Jim Blandy
2001-11-26 23:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-26 20:38 ` Jim Blandy
2001-11-26 21:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-14 0:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-26 22:05 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-11-14 0:15 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-11-27 7:15 ` Jim Blandy
2001-11-14 13:02 ` Jim Blandy
2001-11-27 7:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-14 13:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-26 17:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-15 14:06 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-11-16 11:52 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-11-27 20:49 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-11-27 20:38 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-11-30 9:00 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-11-21 23:07 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-11-22 3:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-30 9:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=npd723j4lc.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com \
--to=jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox