Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes

[Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>]

I typo'd in CC'ing the message below to gdb-patches.  Daniel had my
approval to commit his change to gnu-v3-abi.c.

To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.comb
Subject: Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes
References: <20011126201945.A27754@nevyn.them.org>
	<np667wket5.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
	<20011127020634.A10010@nevyn.them.org>
	<npd723j4lc.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
	<20011130014034.A29999@nevyn.them.org>
Bcc: jimb
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>
Date: 30 Nov 2001 12:12:51 -0500
In-Reply-To: Daniel Jacobowitz's message of Fri, 30 Nov 2001 01:40:34 -0500
Message-ID: <np4rncdvxo.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
Lines: 23
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34
--text follows this line--

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> Jim, can I commit these?  It'll make it easier for me to post the
> following batch.  Now that GCC emits the information I need (on HEAD at
> least) I'd like to finish this up.

Yes, go ahead.

> I guess that I can commit the gnu-v3-abi bits on my own initiative,
> since no one objected... actually, I guess the values stuff is
> unmaintained too?

Well, officially, yes, but my sense is that values.c is a high-traffic
area, so people would squonk more if you just commit stuff there.
I'll let Andrew tell you the Official Position. 

> MAINTAINERS says:
>   If there is no maintainer for a given domain then the responsibility
>   falls to the head maintainer.
> So I guess I need approval from one of Ye Divine Entities first.

... I'm clearly suffering from a divinity deficiency.  But I'll
approve your changes.