Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 11:48:49AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >Jim, can I commit these?  It'll make it easier for me to post the
> >following batch.  Now that GCC emits the information I need (on HEAD at
> >least) I'd like to finish this up.
> >
> >I guess that I can commit the gnu-v3-abi bits on my own initiative,
> >since no one objected... actually, I guess the values stuff is
> >unmaintained too?
> 
> I wouldn't describe it as un-maintained.  It is fundamental core code, 
> JimB and I would both be keeping a very keen eye on it.

Thus confusion :)  MAINTAINERS lists a past maintainer for it and no
current maintainer... so I assumed it was lacking.

> >MAINTAINERS says:
> >  If there is no maintainer for a given domain then the responsibility
> >  falls to the head maintainer.
> >So I guess I need approval from one of Ye Divine Entities first.
> 
> Yes.
> 
> >[Would someone more familiar with the state of affairs than I
> >explicitly list the unmaintained parts in MAINTAINERS?  Quite a few
> >things seem to have slipped down that path.]
> 
> Nothing is is really unmaintained.  The buck (unfortunatly :-) stops 
> here.  Did you have any comments on my recent proposal to change how 
> targets (and natives) can get a change approved?

I don't remember seeing it.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer