From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Blandy To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 11:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011130194347.BCAA75E9D8@zwingli.cygnus.com> References: <20011126201945.A27754@nevyn.them.org> <20011127020634.A10010@nevyn.them.org> <20011130014034.A29999@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00626.html Message-ID: <20011130114200.4h17hbPiE7tnFmuoFfwVVUOcGeU79AC85umEzDns8_w@z> I typo'd in CC'ing the message below to gdb-patches. Daniel had my approval to commit his change to gnu-v3-abi.c. To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.comb Subject: Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes References: < 20011126201945.A27754@nevyn.them.org > < np667wket5.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com > < 20011127020634.A10010@nevyn.them.org > < npd723j4lc.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com > < 20011130014034.A29999@nevyn.them.org > Bcc: jimb From: Jim Blandy Date: 30 Nov 2001 12:12:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: Daniel Jacobowitz's message of Fri, 30 Nov 2001 01:40:34 -0500 Message-ID: Lines: 23 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 --text follows this line-- Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > Jim, can I commit these? It'll make it easier for me to post the > following batch. Now that GCC emits the information I need (on HEAD at > least) I'd like to finish this up. Yes, go ahead. > I guess that I can commit the gnu-v3-abi bits on my own initiative, > since no one objected... actually, I guess the values stuff is > unmaintained too? Well, officially, yes, but my sense is that values.c is a high-traffic area, so people would squonk more if you just commit stuff there. I'll let Andrew tell you the Official Position. > MAINTAINERS says: > If there is no maintainer for a given domain then the responsibility > falls to the head maintainer. > So I guess I need approval from one of Ye Divine Entities first. ... I'm clearly suffering from a divinity deficiency. But I'll approve your changes.