From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <npd723j4lc.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
References: <20011126201945.A27754@nevyn.them.org> <np667wket5.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> <20011127020634.A10010@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00509.html
Message-ID: <20011127131600.tSQxK93gPygOEAOO9qyW-j-9LP629aqWydGJ6aDHdSI@z>

These are two independent fixes, right?  I understand GDB may need
them both before it works correctly; I'm asking if each of them is a
correct change in its own right.  If so, could you show me a test case
that each change fixes?

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> 2001-11-26  Daniel Jacobowitz  <drow@mvista.com>
> 
> 	* values.c (value_primitive_field): Add embedded_offset to the
> 	address of structure members.
> 	* gnu-v3-abi.c (gnuv3_rtti_type): Cast to base type before
> 	attempting to access vtable pointer.  Set using_enc_p if we cast.
> 	(gnuv3_virtual_fn_field): Call value_cast with structure rather than
> 	structure pointer.  Cast to base type before attempting to access
> 	vtable pointer.