Re: [PATCH] Hooks still needed for annotations

[Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>]

 > > > Also, I think it's reasonable to say that GDB should have a parser that
 > > > FE's can use. The only way to have a parser that can be tested properly
 > > > is to allow it to be packaged and tested in GDB's testsuite. Otherwise,
 > > > if the annotations are removed, FE's like GVD, XXGDB, DDD, KGDB, ...
 > > > are either going to "go the way of the bison" or they are going to have
 > > > to write code that handles GDB/MI. Do we really want 5-10 GDB/MI
 > > > parser's out there (each with there own bugs)?
 > > 
 > > This is also unrelated to the removal of annotations.
 > 
 > I think that this could be related (although not a prerequisite) to the 
 > removal of annotations. Only in the sense that the annotations should 
 > stay until GDB/MI is fully mature. I do see your point though, I just 
 > have different motivations than you (I think).

AFAIK the other frontends just use the one annotation, through the option
-fullname or -annotate=1.

Nick