From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hooks still needed for annotations
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 21:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17060.50908.689915.417827@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050603235923.GA9992@nevyn.them.org>
> They are deprecated. I believe there's a clear consensus that the
> entire annotation system is going to go, and in the near future. Just
> not yet.
Then lets try to remove the ones that can go. In 2003 Andrew introduced
level 3 annotations as a subset of level 2 (with the markup annotations
left out). Since then I have been using those quite happily with Emacs.
So, as far as Emacs is concerned, the annotations that are restricted to
level 2 in annotate.c, and this must be over half of them, can go.
Bob is this also the case for CGDB?
Emacs doesn't use breakpoints-invalid or frames-invalid either and they
spew out so often that it makes it hard to interrupt the inferior. However
I would like to keep them for the moment, as they provide clues as to where
to put code for event nortification in MI. Perhaps these could be restricted
to level 2.
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-06 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-01 7:15 Nick Roberts
2005-06-01 11:30 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-01 21:31 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-03 19:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-03 22:35 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-03 23:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-04 3:19 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-03 17:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-03 22:13 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-03 22:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-04 13:02 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-13 3:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-15 15:52 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-15 16:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-15 16:31 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-03 16:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-15 23:07 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-15 23:29 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-01 0:21 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-01 1:18 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-06 21:57 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2005-06-10 2:26 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-10 3:25 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-15 15:24 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-15 21:38 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-15 22:58 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-03 16:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-06 15:03 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-15 0:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17060.50908.689915.417827@farnswood.snap.net.nz \
--to=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
--cc=bob@brasko.net \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox