Re: [PATCH: gdb/mi + doco] -var-update

["Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:34:43 +1300
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
>  > If other messages are marked up with _(), then this is okay.  But I
>  > still think the const char [] strings should be defined once and used
>  > elsewhere in this function.
> 
> OK but this only makes sense if it is done consistently. So I offer to
> do it for all of the MI error messages.

It should be done for all messages, yes; but I'd like at least to have
the new messages follow that principle.

>  > > I've used "--all-values" because, in the case of -var-list-children there
>  > > is a third possibility: "--simple-values" and, to me, it seems simpler to
>  > > have only three values for print_values (mi-cmds.h):
>  > > 
>  > > enum print_values {
>  > >    PRINT_NO_VALUES,
>  > >    PRINT_ALL_VALUES,
>  > >    PRINT_SIMPLE_VALUES
>  > > };
>  > 
>  > I see the reason, but I think it is not important enough to use
>  > "--all-values".  Anyway, the switch text does not need to be similar
>  > to the enum name, even if you use PRINT_ALL_VALUES in the enum.
> 
> OK. But again this only makes sense if I change -var-list-children too.

What change did you have in mind?