Re: [PATCH: gdb/mi + doco] -var-update

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 15:56:30 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>, Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>,
> 	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> Personally, I think --no-values and --all-values are a reasonable pair. 
> But in any case, we all seem agreed that --no-values, --simple-values,
> and --all-values are a reasonable triplet.
> 
> Nick, here's a patch based on yours which adds -var-list-children
> --simple-values and -var-update --simple-values/--all-values.  I like
> it; I think --simple-values is useful (since for anything other than
> simple values, an IDE is likely to want to print each member
> individually...).
> 
> I didn't revise the documentation because your last posted patch didn't
> include the current manual diff.  I also didn't write any testcases. 
> Both of these need to be done before the patch goes in.  Tested on
> i686-pc-linux-gnu, both the testsuite and by hand for -var-update.
> 
> No incompatible changes, option consistency, and behavior consistency. 
> I don't think I can do any better than this :-)  Nick, Eli, are you
> both OK with this version of the code changes?

It's okay with me, but I hope we won't forget the doco changes to go
with these.

Thanks.