From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>, Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH: gdb/mi + doco] -var-update
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uoea51bqt.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050617034329.GH17013@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:43:29 -0400)
> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:43:29 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> I don't remember the entire outcome of your discussion with Eli
My opinion (which Nick eventually accepted, IIRC) is here:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-02/msg00204.html
> but I find the idea of having --with-values sometimes and
> --all-values other times a bit confusing. I went trying to figure
> out which meant what and that's when I noticed this problem.
If you have suggestions for better names for these options, please say
what they are. Alternatively, if you are saying that the manual patch
doesn't explain them well enough, please point out the unclear text.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-17 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-20 2:06 Nick Roberts
2005-02-20 5:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-02-20 5:51 ` Nick Roberts
2005-02-20 15:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-02-21 4:33 ` Nick Roberts
2005-02-21 7:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-02-22 9:23 ` Nick Roberts
2005-02-22 9:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-02-27 5:03 ` Nick Roberts
2005-02-27 16:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-02-27 16:56 ` Nick Roberts
2005-02-28 12:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-19 3:55 ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-01 1:51 ` Bob Rossi
2005-04-01 11:01 ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-02 2:06 ` Nick Roberts
2005-05-02 4:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-02 7:24 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-17 3:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-17 10:09 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-06-17 14:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-18 8:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-07-03 19:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-04 3:07 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-04 3:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-04 4:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-07-04 5:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-04 10:17 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-06 10:00 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-15 1:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-15 3:59 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-15 4:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-15 15:11 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-15 15:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-15 22:37 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-04 21:15 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-04 22:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-07-05 3:25 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-05 19:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-07-15 9:42 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-17 11:42 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-17 14:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-17 23:12 ` Nick Roberts
2005-02-21 2:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2005-02-21 3:28 ` Nick Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=uoea51bqt.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=bob@brasko.net \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox