From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: drow@false.org, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, joseph@codesourcery.com,
kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Assume solib.h
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c4cc1f$Blat.v2.2.2$51444e60@zahav.net.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <419A2B43.6050805@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:30:59 -0500)
> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:30:59 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, joseph@codesourcery.com,
> kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> It could by now have even been committed, if only we'd not been dragged
> down this rat-hole where people start insisting that it has to be tested
> on old crufty systems that likely don't even build. If you want drive
> away native GNU and GNU/Linux developers from what is ment to be a GNU
> project, tell them to fix vax-ultrix.
If you think the affected systems are ``crufty'' and ``old'', please
suggest to declare them deprecated, and let's see if we can reach a
consensus on that. That's our way of saying that a system is ``old
and crufty''.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-16 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-11 19:39 Andrew Cagney
2004-11-11 20:06 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-11 21:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-11 22:24 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-12 15:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-12 17:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-15 21:32 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-11-15 23:35 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-17 17:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-15 23:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-16 1:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-16 5:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 8:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-16 20:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 16:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-16 19:18 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-18 14:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-18 14:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-18 17:28 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-11-19 17:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-19 17:25 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-19 17:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-11-19 17:40 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-19 17:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-11-19 19:29 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-16 21:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 22:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-17 4:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 1:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-16 4:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 16:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-16 19:45 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-16 21:06 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2004-11-12 1:11 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-13 1:10 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01c4cc1f$Blat.v2.2.2$51444e60@zahav.net.il' \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox