From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24054 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2004 21:06:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24020 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2004 21:06:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2004 21:06:10 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.147.231]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR) with ESMTP id DCU42114 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:01:47 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:06:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-ID: <01c4cc1f$Blat.v2.2.2$51444e60@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: drow@false.org, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, joseph@codesourcery.com, kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <419A2B43.6050805@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:30:59 -0500) Subject: Re: Assume solib.h Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4193BFA0.3060607@gnu.org> <200411112005.iABK5FrV098628@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4193DDCE.7060205@gnu.org> <200411112224.iABMODmo099121@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4194DBEB.6010304@gnu.org> <20041116014027.GB31575@nevyn.them.org> <419A2B43.6050805@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:30:59 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > Cc: Mark Kettenis , joseph@codesourcery.com, > kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > It could by now have even been committed, if only we'd not been dragged > down this rat-hole where people start insisting that it has to be tested > on old crufty systems that likely don't even build. If you want drive > away native GNU and GNU/Linux developers from what is ment to be a GNU > project, tell them to fix vax-ultrix. If you think the affected systems are ``crufty'' and ``old'', please suggest to declare them deprecated, and let's see if we can reach a consensus on that. That's our way of saying that a system is ``old and crufty''.