From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: cagney@gnu.org, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, joseph@codesourcery.com,
kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Assume solib.h
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 04:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c4cb98$Blat.v2.2.2$001ec2e0@zahav.net.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041116014027.GB31575@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:40:27 -0500)
> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:40:27 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, joseph@codesourcery.com,
> kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> The timing of deprecating the TM_FILE mechanism was never discussed; it
> got lost in your argument with Eli about xm-go32.h. I apologize for
> not loudly objecting at the time; I was making an obviously futile
> effort to stay out of an increasingly unpleasant argument. The tone
> of the GDB development lists has gotten steadily worse over the last
> year.
I agree with the lament about the tone, and FWIW, I'm sorry for any
contribution I could have made, albeit inadvertently, to things
getting worse lately. Unfortunately, it seems like there's no other
way to disagree with Andrew on matters of principle without getting
into an unpleasant dispute. The only alternative seems to be to shut
up, which I'm not prepared to do, since silence is taken as a sign of
agreement.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-16 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-11 19:39 Andrew Cagney
2004-11-11 20:06 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-11 21:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-11 22:24 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-12 15:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-12 17:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-15 21:32 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-11-15 23:35 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-17 17:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-15 23:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-16 1:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-16 5:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 8:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-16 20:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 16:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-16 19:18 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-18 14:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-18 14:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-18 17:28 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-11-19 17:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-19 17:25 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-19 17:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-11-19 17:40 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-19 17:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-11-19 19:29 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-16 21:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 22:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-17 4:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 1:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-16 4:54 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2004-11-16 16:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-16 19:45 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-16 21:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-12 1:11 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-13 1:10 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01c4cb98$Blat.v2.2.2$001ec2e0@zahav.net.il' \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox