From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12698 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2004 04:54:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12568 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2004 04:54:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2004 04:54:46 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-194-94.inter.net.il [80.230.194.94]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR) with ESMTP id DCQ24701 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 06:53:06 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 04:54:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Daniel Jacobowitz Message-ID: <01c4cb98$Blat.v2.2.2$001ec2e0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: cagney@gnu.org, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, joseph@codesourcery.com, kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20041116014027.GB31575@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:40:27 -0500) Subject: Re: Assume solib.h Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4193BFA0.3060607@gnu.org> <200411112005.iABK5FrV098628@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4193DDCE.7060205@gnu.org> <200411112224.iABMODmo099121@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4194DBEB.6010304@gnu.org> <20041116014027.GB31575@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00325.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:40:27 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Mark Kettenis , joseph@codesourcery.com, > kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > The timing of deprecating the TM_FILE mechanism was never discussed; it > got lost in your argument with Eli about xm-go32.h. I apologize for > not loudly objecting at the time; I was making an obviously futile > effort to stay out of an increasingly unpleasant argument. The tone > of the GDB development lists has gotten steadily worse over the last > year. I agree with the lament about the tone, and FWIW, I'm sorry for any contribution I could have made, albeit inadvertently, to things getting worse lately. Unfortunately, it seems like there's no other way to disagree with Andrew on matters of principle without getting into an unpleasant dispute. The only alternative seems to be to shut up, which I'm not prepared to do, since silence is taken as a sign of agreement.