From: Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Cc: cagney@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Assume solib.h
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041119172539.GR15714@tausq.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <419E2914.1020903@gnu.org>
Andrew,
> Given that no one has raised a concern over my original point that it
> would break _AIX_ and _HPUX_ (the latter doesn't build anyway) (perhaps
> this key point was lost in the noise), and given that Kevin's also given
> his approval, you're finally clear to throw the switch and assume solib.
I *have* raised a concern about breaking HPUX:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-11/msg00259.html
HPUX was building fine until the very recent removal of
deprecated_registers (for which i have a patch that is being tested at
the moment). MichaelC posts test results for hpux somewhat regularly...
while the results are not fantastic, it is still working for people who
use it.....
We can discuss changes required to fix the hpux target, but let's not
assume that hpux support will be gone in the next release (which is
what's currently in the NEWS file...)
randolph
--
Randolph Chung
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports
http://www.tausq.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-19 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-11 19:39 Andrew Cagney
2004-11-11 20:06 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-11 21:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-11 22:24 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-12 15:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-12 17:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-15 21:32 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-11-15 23:35 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-17 17:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-15 23:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-16 1:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-16 5:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 8:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-16 20:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 16:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-16 19:18 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-18 14:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-18 14:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-18 17:28 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-11-19 17:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-19 17:25 ` Randolph Chung [this message]
2004-11-19 17:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-11-19 17:40 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-19 17:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-11-19 19:29 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-16 21:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 22:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-17 4:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 1:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-16 4:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 16:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-16 19:45 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-16 21:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-12 1:11 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-13 1:10 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041119172539.GR15714@tausq.org \
--to=tausq@debian.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox