From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
To: cagney@gnu.org
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, joseph@codesourcery.com, kevinb@redhat.com,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Assume solib.h
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200411181436.iAIEabdF025983@juw15.nfra.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <419CAD27.5080908@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:09:43 -0500)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:09:43 -0500
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> Yup, I'm wrong. Not *every* embedded target will break. Some of them
> include solib-svr4.o or some other solib-xxx.o; powerpc-elf is one of
> them. I'm also wrong that it breaks vax-dec-openbsd* for pretty much
> the same reason. However, there are plenty of embedded targets for
> which I'm pretty certain that my analysis is true: arm-elf, mips-elf,
> i386-elf are among them.
I'm not. Can you test my, or kevin's patch? The're pretty much equivalent.
How can you say that they're equivalent Andrew? That doesn't make any
sense. Kevin's patch fixes what your patch breaks: all targets that
currently don't include any shared library support.
But let's end this discussion. Kevin, can you check in the patch in
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-11/msg00316.html
After that anyone who cares can followup on Andrew's suggestion in
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-11/msg00239.html
I might even do the legwork that's needed.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-18 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-11 19:39 Andrew Cagney
2004-11-11 20:06 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-11 21:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-11 22:24 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-12 15:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-12 17:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-15 21:32 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-11-15 23:35 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-17 17:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-15 23:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-16 1:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-16 5:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 8:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-16 20:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 16:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-16 19:18 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-18 14:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-18 14:37 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2004-11-18 17:28 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-11-19 17:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-19 17:25 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-19 17:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-11-19 17:40 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-19 17:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-11-19 19:29 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-16 21:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 22:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-17 4:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 1:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-16 4:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 16:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-16 19:45 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-16 21:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-12 1:11 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-13 1:10 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200411181436.iAIEabdF025983@juw15.nfra.nl \
--to=kettenis@gnu.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox