From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
To: cagney@gnu.org
Cc: drow@false.org, joseph@codesourcery.com, kevinb@redhat.com,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Assume solib.h
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200411161944.iAGJiI3s000752@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <419A2B43.6050805@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:30:59 -0500)
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:30:59 -0500
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
It could by now have even been committed, if only we'd not been dragged
down this rat-hole where people start insisting that it has to be tested
on old crufty systems that likely don't even build. If you want drive
away native GNU and GNU/Linux developers from what is ment to be a GNU
project, tell them to fix vax-ultrix.
To set this straight: vax-ultrix is an old crufty system that *does*
build. But can we please leave vax-ultrix out of this discussion. As
soon as it really hampers progress, I'll happily scrap it.
While I recognize that GDB's primary target is GNU/Linux, moving into
the direction of GDB as a GNU-only debugger is a bad idea. As I've
stated before, support for other systems makes us take the right
design issues. But what's more important, by turning GDB into a
GNU-only debugger you'll probably loose some of the few active
contributors that we have left.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-16 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-11 19:39 Andrew Cagney
2004-11-11 20:06 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-11 21:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-11 22:24 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-12 15:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-12 17:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-15 21:32 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-11-15 23:35 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-17 17:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-15 23:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-16 1:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-16 5:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 8:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-16 20:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 16:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-16 19:18 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-18 14:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-18 14:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-18 17:28 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-11-19 17:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-19 17:25 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-19 17:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-11-19 17:40 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-19 17:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-11-19 19:29 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-16 21:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 22:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-17 4:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 1:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-16 4:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-16 16:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-16 19:45 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2004-11-16 21:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-12 1:11 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-13 1:10 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200411161944.iAGJiI3s000752@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=kettenis@gnu.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox