Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini)
Subject: [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH] cmm: provide lightweight rmb/wmb on PPC
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:20:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E799028.1010707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110920165115.GA2955@Krystal>

On 09/20/2011 06:51 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> >  I think you're right. "eieio;lwsync" is good for rmb, lwsync is good for
>> >  wmb/smp_rmb/smp_wmb.
> I'm not convinced that the "eieio; lwsync" combo would provide the
> ordering we're looking for for cmm_rmb(). AFAIK, eieio orders,
> separately, a) cacheable stores and b) loads and stores to non-cacheable
> memory. AFAIK, lwsync orders cacheable memory ops, but not loads with
> respect to previous stores. So basically, this combo lacks ordering of
> non-cacheable memory accesses with respect to cachable memory accesses.

Yeah, better safe than sorry.

> Why would lwsync be good for cmm_wmb ? Does it order non-cacheable
> writes ?

The manuals say non-cacheable writes are always ordered.

Paolo




  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-21  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-20  7:12 Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-20 16:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-09-20 16:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-20 16:51     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-09-21  7:20       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2011-09-21 23:43         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-21 23:42     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-22  8:42       ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH v2] cmm: provide lightweight smp_rmb/smp_wmb " Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-22  9:10         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-09-22 14:49         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-22 14:57           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-09-22 15:26             ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E799028.1010707@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox