Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Paul E. McKenney)
Subject: [ltt-dev] [PATCH v2] cmm: provide lightweight smp_rmb/smp_wmb on PPC
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:49:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110922144911.GB2431@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316680972-15081-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:42:52AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> lwsync orders loads in cacheable memory with respect to other loads,
> and stores in cacheable memory with respect to other stores.  Use it
> to implement smp_rmb/smp_wmb.
> 
> The heavy-weight sync is still used for the "full" rmb/wmb operations,
> as well as for smp_mb.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>
> ---
>  urcu/arch/ppc.h |   10 +++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/urcu/arch/ppc.h b/urcu/arch/ppc.h
> index a03d688..05f7db6 100644
> --- a/urcu/arch/ppc.h
> +++ b/urcu/arch/ppc.h
> @@ -32,7 +32,15 @@ extern "C" {
>  /* Include size of POWER5+ L3 cache lines: 256 bytes */
>  #define CAA_CACHE_LINE_SIZE	256
> 
> -#define cmm_mb()    asm volatile("sync":::"memory")
> +#define cmm_mb()         asm volatile("sync":::"memory")
> +
> +/* lwsync does not preserve ordering of cacheable vs. non-cacheable
> + * accesses, but it is good when MMIO is not in use.  An eieio+lwsync
> + * pair is also not enough for rmb, because it will order cacheable
> + * and non-cacheable memory operations separately---i.e. not the latter
> + * against the former.  */
> +#define cmm_smp_rmb()    asm volatile("lwsync":::"memory")
> +#define cmm_smp_wmb()    asm volatile("lwsync":::"memory")

This works for recent Power hardware, and I see no reason to care about
stuff old enough to lack lwsync.  I must defer to others on embedded
PowerPC.

							Thanx, Paul




  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-22 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-20  7:12 [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH] cmm: provide lightweight rmb/wmb " Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-20 16:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-09-20 16:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-20 16:51     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-09-21  7:20       ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-21 23:43         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-21 23:42     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-22  8:42       ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH v2] cmm: provide lightweight smp_rmb/smp_wmb " Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-22  9:10         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-09-22 14:49         ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-09-22 14:57           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-09-22 15:26             ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110922144911.GB2431@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox