Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: "Branko Čibej" <brane@xbc.nu>
Cc: zack@codesourcery.com, eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU, bje@wasabisystems.com,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1ASJio-0005K5-F8@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FCEE9B1.3050703@xbc.nu> (message from =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= on Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:00:49 +0100)

    >The point is that most programs nowadays use Autoconf, so other uses are
    >few.
    >  
    >
    Sorry to barge in again, but config.guess is used by lots of things
    besides programs that use Autoconf; e.g., various sysadmin scripts,
    testing and compilation frameworks, etc. etc., where Autoconf is
    inappropriate but config.guess is immensely useful.

Are you talking about configure scripts that don't use Autoconf?
Or something else entirely?

    Config.guess is not just a utility for Autoconf;

We are miscommunicating; you're arguing against something that is not what
I said.  config.guess is not "a utility for Autoconf".  It's a utility for
configure scripts.  When we developed the configure spec, there was no
such thing as Autoconf.

When Autoconf was developed, it made it possible to write configure scripts
so that they don't need to care about the name of the system.  So
config.guess, and configuration names, are less important than they were in
the past.  Some programs such as GDB still need to check them, but most new
programs rely on Autoconf for the whole job.  At least I think that's the
case for configure scripts.

Are you saying that config.guess is widely used outside of configure
scripts?


  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-05 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-20  9:31 Ben Elliston
2003-11-20 11:34 ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-20 14:12 ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 18:57   ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-20 19:14     ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 19:46       ` Albert Chin-A-Young
2003-11-20 21:02       ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-20 21:19         ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-21  0:33           ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-21  0:44             ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-22 21:28             ` Richard Stallman
2003-11-23 22:13               ` Branko Čibej
2003-11-24  6:33                 ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-24  7:03                   ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-24  9:41                     ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-24 10:01                       ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-24 20:46                         ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-25  7:46                           ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-25 21:55                             ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-26  5:25                               ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-26  5:34                               ` Ben Elliston
2003-11-26 22:59                                 ` Russ Allbery
2003-11-25  4:37                 ` Richard Stallman
2003-11-26  2:03                   ` Zack Weinberg
2003-11-20 21:05     ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-20 21:15       ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 22:27         ` Phil Edwards
2003-11-21 21:39 ` tm_gccmail
2003-11-21 21:45   ` Joe Buck
2003-11-27 10:50 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-11-28 23:22   ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-29  0:25     ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-01 20:50       ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-01 21:29         ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-02 21:29           ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-02 21:40             ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-02 22:08               ` Ben Elliston
2003-12-03 17:17               ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-03 17:22                 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-03 17:26                   ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-04  7:33                   ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-04  8:00                     ` Branko Čibej
2003-12-05 17:26                       ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2003-12-05 17:53                         ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-05 18:44                           ` Joe Buck
2003-12-06 11:31                             ` Nix
2003-12-07 23:04                         ` Branko Čibej
2003-12-04 10:11                     ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-04 10:49                       ` Ben Elliston
2003-12-04 21:37                         ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-04 21:53                           ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-04 23:00                           ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-04 23:04                           ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-04 23:15                             ` Joe Buck
2003-12-04 23:27                               ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-04 23:38                                 ` Ben Elliston
2003-12-04 23:41                                   ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-05 11:44                                     ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-06  5:20                                       ` Eric Botcazou
2003-12-06 20:37                                         ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-06 21:16                                           ` Eric Botcazou
2003-12-07  9:15                                             ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-07  9:45                                               ` Eric Botcazou
2003-12-07 19:20                                               ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-05  4:50                                   ` Russ Allbery
2003-12-05 11:46                                     ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-08 13:25                             ` Rainer Orth
2003-12-08 22:35                               ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-08 23:44                                 ` Rainer Orth
2003-12-08 23:51                                   ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-10  0:03                                   ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-12  5:24                                   ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-12  5:38                                     ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-12 21:26                                     ` Rainer Orth
2003-12-05 23:20                       ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-04 14:16                     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-02 22:47 Wolfgang Bangerth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1ASJio-0005K5-F8@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=bje@wasabisystems.com \
    --cc=brane@xbc.nu \
    --cc=eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox