From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU, bje@wasabisystems.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 07:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1ARnzC-0007tg-2x@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ad69rf42.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> (zack@codesourcery.com)
> Don't we know that most programs that use Autoconf don't actually look
> at the configuration name at all?
Paul Eggert already presented evidence that roughly 10% of a sample of
configure.in scripts not only look at the configuration name, but
match it against patterns containing the string "solaris" or "sunos".
To my mind that is enough to rule out the proposed change as too costly.
I'm surprised it is so many. As someone pointed out, the real extent of
the problem depends on how many of them check the version number as well
as the name. It should be pretty easy to measure that too.
And, for the third time, Autoconf is not the only user of
config.guess/config.sub.
The point is that most programs nowadays use Autoconf, so other uses are
few.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-04 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-20 9:31 Ben Elliston
2003-11-20 11:34 ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-20 14:12 ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 18:57 ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-20 19:14 ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 19:46 ` Albert Chin-A-Young
2003-11-20 21:02 ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-20 21:19 ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-21 0:33 ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-21 0:44 ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-22 21:28 ` Richard Stallman
2003-11-23 22:13 ` Branko Čibej
2003-11-24 6:33 ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-24 7:03 ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-24 9:41 ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-24 10:01 ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-24 20:46 ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-25 7:46 ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-25 21:55 ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-26 5:25 ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-26 5:34 ` Ben Elliston
2003-11-26 22:59 ` Russ Allbery
2003-11-25 4:37 ` Richard Stallman
2003-11-26 2:03 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-11-20 21:05 ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-20 21:15 ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 22:27 ` Phil Edwards
2003-11-21 21:39 ` tm_gccmail
2003-11-21 21:45 ` Joe Buck
2003-11-27 10:50 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-11-28 23:22 ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-29 0:25 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-01 20:50 ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-01 21:29 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-02 21:29 ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-02 21:40 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-02 22:08 ` Ben Elliston
2003-12-03 17:17 ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-03 17:22 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-03 17:26 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-04 7:33 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2003-12-04 8:00 ` Branko Čibej
2003-12-05 17:26 ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-05 17:53 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-05 18:44 ` Joe Buck
2003-12-06 11:31 ` Nix
2003-12-07 23:04 ` Branko Čibej
2003-12-04 10:11 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-04 10:49 ` Ben Elliston
2003-12-04 21:37 ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-04 21:53 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-04 23:00 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-04 23:04 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-04 23:15 ` Joe Buck
2003-12-04 23:27 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-04 23:38 ` Ben Elliston
2003-12-04 23:41 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-05 11:44 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-06 5:20 ` Eric Botcazou
2003-12-06 20:37 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-06 21:16 ` Eric Botcazou
2003-12-07 9:15 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-07 9:45 ` Eric Botcazou
2003-12-07 19:20 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-05 4:50 ` Russ Allbery
2003-12-05 11:46 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-08 13:25 ` Rainer Orth
2003-12-08 22:35 ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-08 23:44 ` Rainer Orth
2003-12-08 23:51 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-10 0:03 ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-12 5:24 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-12 5:38 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-12 21:26 ` Rainer Orth
2003-12-05 23:20 ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-04 14:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-02 22:47 Wolfgang Bangerth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1ARnzC-0007tg-2x@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=bje@wasabisystems.com \
--cc=eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox