Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Cc: config-patches@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, ro@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de,
	bje@wasabisystems.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
	binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
	brane@xbc.nu
Subject: Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 07:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200311240804.22577.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878ym6tgw4.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu>

> Most of them won't care one way or another, for the same reason that
> only a tiny fraction of GNU programs care.

Do you have any numbers backing this statement?

> Obviously there are both pros and cons to changing config.guess to use
> correct Sun version numbers.  The people who will be hassled by the
> correction (namely, a handful of maintainers) are more likely to
> complain about it, while the people who will benefit from the
> correction (e.g., newbie installers) don't know what's happening and
> we won't hear from them here.

I tend to think that people compiling sources on Solaris boxes are not 
newbies.

> (If the American Congress were to vote on this issue, the handful of
> special interests would win hands down. Sigh. :-)

I'd rather say: classical tension between experts in a field and the 
non-expert public.  The experts' opinion may sometimes be valuable :-)

> ro didn't favor the proposed change, but suggested that if we change
> it, we should standardize on -sunos uniformly, and use e.g., -sunos5.9
> rather than -solaris9.  That's fine with me, and in fact it's a bit
> cleaner.

But is only marginally clearer for so-called newbies.  And in the GCC tree, 
for example, all SunOS-specific files are named sol2*.

-- 
Eric Botcazou


  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-24  7:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-20  9:31 Ben Elliston
2003-11-20 11:34 ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-20 14:12 ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 18:57   ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-20 19:14     ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 19:46       ` Albert Chin-A-Young
2003-11-20 21:02       ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-20 21:19         ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-21  0:33           ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-21  0:44             ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-22 21:28             ` Richard Stallman
2003-11-23 22:13               ` Branko Čibej
2003-11-24  6:33                 ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-24  7:03                   ` Eric Botcazou [this message]
2003-11-24  9:41                     ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-24 10:01                       ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-24 20:46                         ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-25  7:46                           ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-25 21:55                             ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-26  5:25                               ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-26  5:34                               ` Ben Elliston
2003-11-26 22:59                                 ` Russ Allbery
2003-11-25  4:37                 ` Richard Stallman
2003-11-26  2:03                   ` Zack Weinberg
2003-11-20 21:05     ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-20 21:15       ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 22:27         ` Phil Edwards
2003-11-21 21:39 ` tm_gccmail
2003-11-21 21:45   ` Joe Buck
2003-11-27 10:50 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-11-28 23:22   ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-29  0:25     ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-01 20:50       ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-01 21:29         ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-02 21:29           ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-02 21:40             ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-02 22:08               ` Ben Elliston
2003-12-03 17:17               ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-03 17:22                 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-03 17:26                   ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-04  7:33                   ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-04  8:00                     ` Branko Čibej
2003-12-05 17:26                       ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-05 17:53                         ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-05 18:44                           ` Joe Buck
2003-12-06 11:31                             ` Nix
2003-12-07 23:04                         ` Branko Čibej
2003-12-04 10:11                     ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-04 10:49                       ` Ben Elliston
2003-12-04 21:37                         ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-04 21:53                           ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-04 23:00                           ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-04 23:04                           ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-04 23:15                             ` Joe Buck
2003-12-04 23:27                               ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-04 23:38                                 ` Ben Elliston
2003-12-04 23:41                                   ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-05 11:44                                     ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-06  5:20                                       ` Eric Botcazou
2003-12-06 20:37                                         ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-06 21:16                                           ` Eric Botcazou
2003-12-07  9:15                                             ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-07  9:45                                               ` Eric Botcazou
2003-12-07 19:20                                               ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-05  4:50                                   ` Russ Allbery
2003-12-05 11:46                                     ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-08 13:25                             ` Rainer Orth
2003-12-08 22:35                               ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-08 23:44                                 ` Rainer Orth
2003-12-08 23:51                                   ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-10  0:03                                   ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-12  5:24                                   ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-12  5:38                                     ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-12 21:26                                     ` Rainer Orth
2003-12-05 23:20                       ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-04 14:16                     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-02 22:47 Wolfgang Bangerth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200311240804.22577.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr \
    --to=ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=bje@wasabisystems.com \
    --cc=brane@xbc.nu \
    --cc=config-patches@gnu.org \
    --cc=eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=ro@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox