Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Cc: config-patches@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, ro@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de,
	bje@wasabisystems.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
	binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
	brane@xbc.nu
Subject: Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87u14uqf2u.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200311240804.22577.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> writes:

> > Most of them won't care one way or another, for the same reason that
> > only a tiny fraction of GNU programs care.
> 
> Do you have any numbers backing this statement?

Only the numbers mentioned on this thread.  I think about 10 programs
have been mentioned as being affected by this change, most of which
are not GNU programs.

The vast majority of programs don't care about this stuff, as far as I
can tell.


> I tend to think that people compiling sources on Solaris boxes are not 
> newbies.

Hmm, well, I currently have 60 students compiling sources on Solaris
boxes.  They're all Solaris newbies.

Just one data point, I know, but there are still a reasonable number
of Solaris newbies out there.  (I've asked the school to switch to
GNU/Linux; but for various reasons it probably won't happen any time
soon.)


> In the GCC tree, for example, all SunOS-specific files are named
> sol2*.

Not all SunOS-specific files in GCC are named sol2*.  Only files
specific to SunOS 5.0 and later have that name.  Other files have
sunos4* names and suchlike.  This is an example of naming confusion
within GCC, but I don't propose to change all that right now.  (One
step at a time.)


  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-24  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-20  9:31 Ben Elliston
2003-11-20 11:34 ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-20 14:12 ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 18:57   ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-20 19:14     ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 19:46       ` Albert Chin-A-Young
2003-11-20 21:02       ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-20 21:19         ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-21  0:33           ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-21  0:44             ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-22 21:28             ` Richard Stallman
2003-11-23 22:13               ` Branko Čibej
2003-11-24  6:33                 ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-24  7:03                   ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-24  9:41                     ` Paul Eggert [this message]
2003-11-24 10:01                       ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-24 20:46                         ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-25  7:46                           ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-25 21:55                             ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-26  5:25                               ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-26  5:34                               ` Ben Elliston
2003-11-26 22:59                                 ` Russ Allbery
2003-11-25  4:37                 ` Richard Stallman
2003-11-26  2:03                   ` Zack Weinberg
2003-11-20 21:05     ` Eric Botcazou
2003-11-20 21:15       ` Rainer Orth
2003-11-20 22:27         ` Phil Edwards
2003-11-21 21:39 ` tm_gccmail
2003-11-21 21:45   ` Joe Buck
2003-11-27 10:50 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-11-28 23:22   ` Paul Eggert
2003-11-29  0:25     ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-01 20:50       ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-01 21:29         ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-02 21:29           ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-02 21:40             ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-02 22:08               ` Ben Elliston
2003-12-03 17:17               ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-03 17:22                 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-03 17:26                   ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-04  7:33                   ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-04  8:00                     ` Branko Čibej
2003-12-05 17:26                       ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-05 17:53                         ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-05 18:44                           ` Joe Buck
2003-12-06 11:31                             ` Nix
2003-12-07 23:04                         ` Branko Čibej
2003-12-04 10:11                     ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-04 10:49                       ` Ben Elliston
2003-12-04 21:37                         ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-04 21:53                           ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-04 23:00                           ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-04 23:04                           ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-04 23:15                             ` Joe Buck
2003-12-04 23:27                               ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-04 23:38                                 ` Ben Elliston
2003-12-04 23:41                                   ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-05 11:44                                     ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-06  5:20                                       ` Eric Botcazou
2003-12-06 20:37                                         ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-06 21:16                                           ` Eric Botcazou
2003-12-07  9:15                                             ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-12-07  9:45                                               ` Eric Botcazou
2003-12-07 19:20                                               ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-05  4:50                                   ` Russ Allbery
2003-12-05 11:46                                     ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-08 13:25                             ` Rainer Orth
2003-12-08 22:35                               ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-08 23:44                                 ` Rainer Orth
2003-12-08 23:51                                   ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-10  0:03                                   ` Paul Eggert
2003-12-12  5:24                                   ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-12-12  5:38                                     ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-12 21:26                                     ` Rainer Orth
2003-12-05 23:20                       ` Richard Stallman
2003-12-04 14:16                     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-02 22:47 Wolfgang Bangerth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87u14uqf2u.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu \
    --to=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=bje@wasabisystems.com \
    --cc=brane@xbc.nu \
    --cc=config-patches@gnu.org \
    --cc=ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=ro@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox