From: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
To: Mikhail Terekhov <Mikhail.Terekhov@dell.com>,
Petr Ovtchenkov <ptr@void-ptr.info>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: meaning of "Automatic date update in version.in" commits
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7716f103-1abd-a9fe-14e5-cbbe5a62eb01@ubuntu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <218bf365-1f36-3531-b42b-5b48499992ed@dell.com>
On 20.09.2017 21:26, Mikhail Terekhov wrote:
> On 09/20/17 14:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 20.09.2017 19:23, Petr Ovtchenkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:16:45 +0200
>>> Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sep 20 2017, Petr Ovtchenkov <ptr@void-ptr.info> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What is the meaning of "Automatic date update in version.in" commits?
>>>>> I mean commits like f625a739e5.
>>>> It is used to name the shared libbfd and libopcodes, since there is no
>>>> stable ABI.
>>>>
>>>>> This commits litter commits tree and create problems for
>>>>> deterministic, bit-identical and/or verifiable builds.
>>>> Why is that a problem? The version is fixed for a particular source
>>>> snapshot.
>>>>
>>> It's looks as a problem indeed:
>>> - garbage in commits
>>> - disorientation, when date present in SONAME
>>> 0x000000000000000e (SONAME) Library soname:
>>> [libbfd-2.29.0.20170729.so]
>> this is correct, and it's usually set to not include the date for a releases, an
>> exception being the 2.29.1 release, but things happen.
>>
>>> You see:
>>>
>>> git show 3110f4be18a2
>>> commit 3110f4be18a2f3b9fcd9663ed1dd141bbd6ed14f
>>> Author: GDB Administrator <gdbadmin@sourceware.org>
>>> Date: Wed Sep 20 00:01:01 2017 +0000
>>>
>>> Automatic date update in version.in
>>>
>>> diff --git a/bfd/version.h b/bfd/version.h
>>> index 3405e42..955269f 100644
>>> --- a/bfd/version.h
>>> +++ b/bfd/version.h
>>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>>> -#define BFD_VERSION_DATE 20170919
>>> +#define BFD_VERSION_DATE 20170920
>>> #define BFD_VERSION @bfd_version@
>>> #define BFD_VERSION_STRING @bfd_version_package@ @bfd_version_string@
>>> #define REPORT_BUGS_TO @report_bugs_to@
>>>
>>> git show f625a739
>>> commit f625a739e567f0110b2675539b7a0e5d5f67c5dc
>>> Author: GDB Administrator <gdbadmin@sourceware.org>
>>> Date: Wed Sep 20 00:01:22 2017 +0000
>>>
>>> Automatic date update in version.in
>>>
>>> diff --git a/bfd/version.h b/bfd/version.h
>>> index 3405e42..955269f 100644
>>> --- a/bfd/version.h
>>> +++ b/bfd/version.h
>>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>>> -#define BFD_VERSION_DATE 20170919
>>> +#define BFD_VERSION_DATE 20170920
>>> #define BFD_VERSION @bfd_version@
>>> #define BFD_VERSION_STRING @bfd_version_package@ @bfd_version_string@
>>> #define REPORT_BUGS_TO @report_bugs_to@
>>>
>>> git diff 3110f4be18a2 f625a739
>>> ...
>>> Ooops....
>>>
>>> This approch produce ambiguity, but try to conceal it.
>> Feel free to limit the bumps to exactly one after another commit.
>>
> What if build scripts obtain date of last commit automatically i.e. something
> like this:
>
> ~/tmp/gdb/binutils-gdb (master)>git log -1 --format=%cd --date=format:%Y%m%d
> 20170920
>
> Then there is no need for additional commit.
no, you can't assume that git is available for builds.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-20 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170920173622.28500ccf@void-ptr.info>
2017-09-20 15:05 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-09-20 15:33 ` Petr Ovtchenkov
2017-09-21 17:07 ` Ian Lance Taylor via gdb
2017-09-20 15:40 ` Matthias Klose
2017-09-20 15:48 ` Dmitry Samersoff
[not found] ` <87zi9p2vma.fsf@linux-m68k.org>
2017-09-20 17:24 ` Petr Ovtchenkov
[not found] ` <7217d33d-61eb-732e-dfd6-80ef4908743e@ubuntu.com>
2017-09-20 19:21 ` Petr Ovtchenkov
2017-09-20 19:27 ` Mikhail Terekhov
2017-09-20 19:56 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2017-09-20 19:57 ` Matthias Klose [this message]
2017-09-20 20:07 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2017-09-20 20:21 ` Matthias Klose
2017-09-20 20:26 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2017-09-20 20:31 ` Petr Ovtchenkov
2017-09-20 20:39 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2017-09-20 20:34 ` Mikhail Terekhov
2017-09-20 21:34 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-09-21 5:03 Fiodar Stryzhniou via gdb
2017-09-21 8:42 ` Matt Rice
2017-09-21 10:58 ` Petr Ovtchenkov
2017-09-21 11:37 ` Pedro Alves
[not found] ` <20170921152240.16bb4cc0@void-ptr.info>
2017-09-21 12:39 ` Pedro Alves
2017-09-21 13:17 ` Petr Ovtchenkov
2017-09-21 13:34 ` Simon Marchi
2017-09-21 15:46 ` Petr Ovtchenkov
2017-09-21 16:01 ` Simon Marchi
2017-09-21 16:03 ` Matthias Klose
2017-09-21 16:26 ` Petr Ovtchenkov
2017-09-21 16:34 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-09-21 16:52 ` Petr Ovtchenkov
2017-09-21 17:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-09-21 17:39 ` Petr Ovtchenkov
2017-09-21 23:59 ` Alan Modra
2017-09-22 5:31 ` Petr Ovtchenkov
2017-09-22 6:49 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-09-22 9:29 ` Petr Ovtchenkov
2017-09-22 22:26 ` H.J. Lu
2017-09-22 22:35 ` H.J. Lu
2017-09-21 17:17 ` Joseph Myers
2017-09-21 17:31 ` Matt Rice
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7716f103-1abd-a9fe-14e5-cbbe5a62eb01@ubuntu.com \
--to=doko@ubuntu.com \
--cc=Mikhail.Terekhov@dell.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=ptr@void-ptr.info \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox