* Encouraging patch reviewers
@ 2008-06-28 18:43 Stan Shebs
2008-06-29 14:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stan Shebs @ 2008-06-28 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
At the GCC summit we discussed patch review a bit, and one of the
thoughts was that people who are not official maintainers of anything
will often study a posted patch, and get a good idea of whether it's
desirable, needs fixes, etc, but then maybe don't say anything because
it won't be an "official" opinion. But it really does help to post such
reviews, and quite likely a maintainer will simply rubberstamp it,
saving time all around. So speaking up really helps, but in looking at
gdb/MAINTAINERS I don't see anything that explicitly encourages people
to post their own reviews - it just says "anyone [...] may suggest
changes or ask questions". Does anybody think we need stronger phrasing
here, and if so, how should it read?
Stan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Encouraging patch reviewers
2008-06-28 18:43 Encouraging patch reviewers Stan Shebs
@ 2008-06-29 14:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-06-29 15:05 ` Robert Dewar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2008-06-29 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stan Shebs; +Cc: gdb
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:42:48AM -0700, Stan Shebs wrote:
> At the GCC summit we discussed patch review a bit, and one of the
> thoughts was that people who are not official maintainers of anything
> will often study a posted patch, and get a good idea of whether it's
> desirable, needs fixes, etc, but then maybe don't say anything because it
> won't be an "official" opinion. But it really does help to post such
> reviews, and quite likely a maintainer will simply rubberstamp it, saving
> time all around. So speaking up really helps, but in looking at
> gdb/MAINTAINERS I don't see anything that explicitly encourages people to
> post their own reviews - it just says "anyone [...] may suggest changes or
> ask questions". Does anybody think we need stronger phrasing here, and if
> so, how should it read?
I'd be happy with something stronger.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Encouraging patch reviewers
2008-06-29 14:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2008-06-29 15:05 ` Robert Dewar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert Dewar @ 2008-06-29 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stan Shebs, gdb
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:42:48AM -0700, Stan Shebs wrote:
>> At the GCC summit we discussed patch review a bit, and one of the
>> thoughts was that people who are not official maintainers of anything
>> will often study a posted patch, and get a good idea of whether it's
>> desirable, needs fixes, etc, but then maybe don't say anything because it
>> won't be an "official" opinion. But it really does help to post such
>> reviews, and quite likely a maintainer will simply rubberstamp it, saving
>> time all around. So speaking up really helps, but in looking at
>> gdb/MAINTAINERS I don't see anything that explicitly encourages people to
>> post their own reviews - it just says "anyone [...] may suggest changes or
>> ask questions". Does anybody think we need stronger phrasing here, and if
>> so, how should it read?
>
> I'd be happy with something stronger.
I agree, we want to take advantage of anyone willing to put in this
useful work, we don't want them to refrain because they are concerned
that it is not appropriate, or they will be stepping on someones toes.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-29 15:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-28 18:43 Encouraging patch reviewers Stan Shebs
2008-06-29 14:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-06-29 15:05 ` Robert Dewar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox