From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Cc: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
Subject: Re: asynchronous MI output commands
Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 16:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060506152046.GA24267@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060506114933.GF25114@brasko.net>
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 07:49:34AM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
> Right, synchronous is a response to a command. That's also the
> definition I was using. However the initial output is not a response to
> a command and it also does not semantically end up being asynchronous.
Why do you think it is not asynchronous? If you want to be picky about
the grammar, it's an out of band message.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-06 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-06 1:26 Bob Rossi
2006-05-06 1:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-06 2:48 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-06 3:37 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-06 15:20 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-06 4:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-06 4:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-06 11:53 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-06 12:06 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-06 3:14 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-06 4:04 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-06 11:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-06 11:50 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-06 16:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-05-06 19:45 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-06 20:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-07 0:44 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-07 20:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-07 20:42 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-07 22:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-08 1:22 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-08 2:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-09 21:48 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-08 6:38 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-08 11:28 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-08 1:26 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-06 11:51 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-06 3:27 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-06 16:40 ` Bob Rossi
[not found] <1147034156.28828.ezmlm@sourceware.org>
2006-05-07 21:27 ` Bjarke Viksoe
2006-05-07 21:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-10 12:43 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-05-07 22:30 Bjarke Viksoe
2006-05-07 22:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-08 0:36 ` Bjarke Viksoe
2006-05-08 1:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-09 9:46 Alain Magloire
2006-05-10 22:15 Alain Magloire
2006-05-11 3:41 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-11 8:58 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-05-11 10:48 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-11 10:52 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-05-11 11:14 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-11 12:50 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-05-11 14:50 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-11 15:02 Alain Magloire
2006-05-11 15:42 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-11 16:40 ` Jim Ingham
2006-05-11 17:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-11 17:35 ` Jim Ingham
2006-05-11 19:24 ` Bob Rossi
2006-05-11 19:25 ` Jim Ingham
2006-05-12 0:19 Alain Magloire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060506152046.GA24267@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox