From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3082 invoked by alias); 6 May 2006 15:20:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 3074 invoked by uid 22791); 6 May 2006 15:20:52 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 May 2006 15:20:49 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FcOaM-0006KI-LF; Sat, 06 May 2006 11:20:46 -0400 Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 16:52:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sourceware.org Cc: Nick Roberts Subject: Re: asynchronous MI output commands Message-ID: <20060506152046.GA24267@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org, Nick Roberts References: <20060506012706.GA25114@brasko.net> <20060506015903.GA13095@nevyn.them.org> <20060506031435.GE25114@brasko.net> <17500.8198.679332.240864@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20060506040637.GA14894@nevyn.them.org> <20060506114933.GF25114@brasko.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060506114933.GF25114@brasko.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 07:49:34AM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > Right, synchronous is a response to a command. That's also the > definition I was using. However the initial output is not a response to > a command and it also does not semantically end up being asynchronous. Why do you think it is not asynchronous? If you want to be picky about the grammar, it's an out of band message. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery