* Apple's async changes
@ 2003-12-04 23:17 Mark Newman
2003-12-05 17:56 ` Mark Newman
2003-12-05 20:49 ` Jason Molenda
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mark Newman @ 2003-12-04 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
Would it be possible for Apple to provide a current
snap of their version of gdb?
The current snaps are old and I would like to reflect
some of their work into async.
Mark Newman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Apple's async changes
2003-12-04 23:17 Apple's async changes Mark Newman
@ 2003-12-05 17:56 ` Mark Newman
2003-12-05 17:58 ` Jim Ingham
2003-12-05 20:49 ` Jason Molenda
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mark Newman @ 2003-12-05 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Newman, gdb; +Cc: jingham
Jim Ingham -
Would it be possible to get a freash snap of the Apple
surce code? You pointed out where the CVS is -
however there are problems using the Apple CVS. Is
there anything that I can do to help getting a snap to
the FSF?
Mark Newman
--- Mark Newman <markn_46@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Would it be possible for Apple to provide a current
> snap of their version of gdb?
>
> The current snaps are old and I would like to
> reflect
> some of their work into async.
>
> Mark Newman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Apple's async changes
2003-12-05 17:56 ` Mark Newman
@ 2003-12-05 17:58 ` Jim Ingham
2003-12-05 19:20 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jim Ingham @ 2003-12-05 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Newman; +Cc: gdb
What are the problems using the Apple CVS?
Jim
On Dec 5, 2003, at 9:56 AM, Mark Newman wrote:
> Jim Ingham -
>
> Would it be possible to get a freash snap of the Apple
> surce code? You pointed out where the CVS is -
> however there are problems using the Apple CVS. Is
> there anything that I can do to help getting a snap to
> the FSF?
>
> Mark Newman
>
> --- Mark Newman <markn_46@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Would it be possible for Apple to provide a current
>> snap of their version of gdb?
>>
>> The current snaps are old and I would like to
>> reflect
>> some of their work into async.
>>
>> Mark Newman
>
>
--
Jim Ingham jingham@apple.com
Developer Tools
Apple Computer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Apple's async changes
2003-12-05 17:58 ` Jim Ingham
@ 2003-12-05 19:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-05 20:34 ` Jason Molenda
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2003-12-05 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Ingham; +Cc: Mark Newman, gdb
> What are the problems using the Apple CVS?
People are more comfortable (and feel that they are on safer legal
ground) if they take change from a work that Apple has clearly and
publically contributed to and been accepted by the FSF.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Apple's async changes
2003-12-05 19:20 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2003-12-05 20:34 ` Jason Molenda
2003-12-05 21:08 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2003-12-05 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Mark Newman, Jim Ingham, gdb
That's absurd -- I think you're the only one concerned about the fact
that we haven't tarred up our sources on some given date and uploaded
them to an ftp server. Is it the statement that you want? Like the
one I wrote when I tarred up the sources and uploaded them to the ftp
server a while back? I can write another one saying "Yeah, it's all
for the FSF, please anyone who wants to use any of that code, do it,"
if that makes a difference in your mind. No one in the Apple developer
tools department -- up through our VP -- wants anything but to
contribute this code to the FSF source bases.
The async code in the last Apple drop and the async code in the Apple
CVS repo are very nearly identical - we got that working long ago, and
we only fix an occasional bug a couple times a year.
J
On Dec 5, 2003, at 11:20 AM, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>> What are the problems using the Apple CVS?
>
> People are more comfortable (and feel that they are on safer legal
> ground) if they take change from a work that Apple has clearly and
> publically contributed to and been accepted by the FSF.
>
> Andrew
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Apple's async changes
2003-12-04 23:17 Apple's async changes Mark Newman
2003-12-05 17:56 ` Mark Newman
@ 2003-12-05 20:49 ` Jason Molenda
2003-12-05 22:25 ` Mark Newman
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2003-12-05 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Newman; +Cc: gdb
By the way, in case anyone didn't have the instructions handy, here's
the page about the Apple public cvs server:
http://developer.apple.com/darwin/tools/cvs/howto.html
In short, do
cvs -d :pserver:anonymous@anoncvs.opensource.apple.com:/cvs/root login
("anonyous")
cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anonymous@anoncvs.opensource.apple.com:/cvs/root co
gdb
Jason
On Dec 4, 2003, at 3:17 PM, Mark Newman wrote:
>
> Would it be possible for Apple to provide a current
> snap of their version of gdb?
>
> The current snaps are old and I would like to reflect
> some of their work into async.
>
> Mark Newman
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Apple's async changes
2003-12-05 20:34 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2003-12-05 21:08 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2003-12-05 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: Mark Newman, Jim Ingham, gdb
> That's absurd -- I think you're the only one concerned about the fact that we haven't tarred up our sources on some given date and uploaded them to an ftp server. Is it the statement that you want? Like the one I wrote when I tarred up the sources and uploaded them to the ftp server a while back? I can write another one saying "Yeah, it's all for the FSF, please anyone who wants to use any of that code, do it," if that makes a difference in your mind. No one in the Apple developer tools department -- up through our VP -- wants anything but to contribute this code to the FSF source bases.
>
> The async code in the last Apple drop and the async code in the Apple CVS repo are very nearly identical - we got that working long ago, and we only fix an occasional bug a couple times a year.
Mark Newman, who is currently working on async, has had concerns raised
by his legal counsel about him taking code from an apple repository.
Rather than run around in circles over this, I figured it would be
easier to just get you to bundle up a snapshot and shoot it over. That
way, we can side step the lawyers.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Apple's async changes
2003-12-05 20:49 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2003-12-05 22:25 ` Mark Newman
2003-12-06 1:43 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mark Newman @ 2003-12-05 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: gdb
I'm sorry Jason - I know that it appears ridiculous
but the attorney that I talked to made it clear that I
could only use something from the FSF. I am sorry
that I am causing such a problem but I have to follow
the rules that they are laying down for me. Beleive
me that I also think that this is ridiculous - that is
what lawyers do.
Please help me out - I would like to leverage off of
Apple's stuff for async. If what has already been
delivered is the bulk of the changes then I will live
with that. However I would very much like to have
current code.
I am sorry that this is working out this way - please
bear with me.
Mark Newman
--- Jason Molenda <jmolenda@apple.com> wrote:
> By the way, in case anyone didn't have the
> instructions handy, here's
> the page about the Apple public cvs server:
>
>
http://developer.apple.com/darwin/tools/cvs/howto.html
>
> In short, do
>
> cvs -d
>
:pserver:anonymous@anoncvs.opensource.apple.com:/cvs/root
> login
> ("anonyous")
> cvs -z3 -d
>
:pserver:anonymous@anoncvs.opensource.apple.com:/cvs/root
> co
> gdb
>
> Jason
>
> On Dec 4, 2003, at 3:17 PM, Mark Newman wrote:
>
> >
> > Would it be possible for Apple to provide a
> current
> > snap of their version of gdb?
> >
> > The current snaps are old and I would like to
> reflect
> > some of their work into async.
> >
> > Mark Newman
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Apple's async changes
2003-12-05 22:25 ` Mark Newman
@ 2003-12-06 1:43 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-12-06 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Newman; +Cc: Jason Molenda, gdb
On Dec 5, 2003, at 5:25 PM, Mark Newman wrote:
> I'm sorry Jason - I know that it appears ridiculous
> but the attorney that I talked to made it clear that I
> could only use something from the FSF. I am sorry
> that I am causing such a problem but I have to follow
> the rules that they are laying down for me. Beleive
> me that I also think that this is ridiculous - that is
> what lawyers do.
Not all of us.
Personally, i'm about to be a lawyer, and i find this particular case
ridiculous too.
But there are some incredibly anal retentive lawyers out there, who
think it helps their clients, when in actuality it hurts them.
--Dan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-06 1:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-04 23:17 Apple's async changes Mark Newman
2003-12-05 17:56 ` Mark Newman
2003-12-05 17:58 ` Jim Ingham
2003-12-05 19:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-05 20:34 ` Jason Molenda
2003-12-05 21:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-05 20:49 ` Jason Molenda
2003-12-05 22:25 ` Mark Newman
2003-12-06 1:43 ` Daniel Berlin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox