From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29042 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2003 19:20:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29034 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2003 19:20:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2003 19:20:38 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816352B8F; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 14:20:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3FD0DA86.8070001@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 19:20:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Ingham Cc: Mark Newman , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Apple's async changes References: <20031205175620.63868.qmail@web13806.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00117.txt.bz2 > What are the problems using the Apple CVS? People are more comfortable (and feel that they are on safer legal ground) if they take change from a work that Apple has clearly and publically contributed to and been accepted by the FSF. Andrew