From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1678 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2003 20:34:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1669 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2003 20:34:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2003 20:34:37 -0000 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB5KYanc009933 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:34:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from scv2.apple.com (scv2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:34:34 -0800 Received: from [17.201.22.21] (moleja.apple.com [17.201.22.21]) by scv2.apple.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB5KYDEV006614; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:34:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3FD0DA86.8070001@gnu.org> References: <20031205175620.63868.qmail@web13806.mail.yahoo.com> <3FD0DA86.8070001@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <4FE5663F-2762-11D8-9FBF-000393D457E2@apple.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark Newman , Jim Ingham , gdb@sources.redhat.com From: Jason Molenda Subject: Re: Apple's async changes Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:34:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2 That's absurd -- I think you're the only one concerned about the fact that we haven't tarred up our sources on some given date and uploaded them to an ftp server. Is it the statement that you want? Like the one I wrote when I tarred up the sources and uploaded them to the ftp server a while back? I can write another one saying "Yeah, it's all for the FSF, please anyone who wants to use any of that code, do it," if that makes a difference in your mind. No one in the Apple developer tools department -- up through our VP -- wants anything but to contribute this code to the FSF source bases. The async code in the last Apple drop and the async code in the Apple CVS repo are very nearly identical - we got that working long ago, and we only fix an occasional bug a couple times a year. J On Dec 5, 2003, at 11:20 AM, Andrew Cagney wrote: >> What are the problems using the Apple CVS? > > People are more comfortable (and feel that they are on safer legal > ground) if they take change from a work that Apple has clearly and > publically contributed to and been accepted by the FSF. > > Andrew > >