From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13327 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2003 01:43:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13320 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2003 01:43:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (69.3.5.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2003 01:43:16 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.7] (account dberlin [192.168.1.7] verified) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.4) with ESMTP-TLS id 5550816; Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:43:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20031205222554.70148.qmail@web13803.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20031205222554.70148.qmail@web13803.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v608) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <8110EF08-278D-11D8-92D8-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jason Molenda , gdb@sources.redhat.com From: Daniel Berlin Subject: Re: Apple's async changes Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 01:43:00 -0000 To: Mark Newman X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2 On Dec 5, 2003, at 5:25 PM, Mark Newman wrote: > I'm sorry Jason - I know that it appears ridiculous > but the attorney that I talked to made it clear that I > could only use something from the FSF. I am sorry > that I am causing such a problem but I have to follow > the rules that they are laying down for me. Beleive > me that I also think that this is ridiculous - that is > what lawyers do. Not all of us. Personally, i'm about to be a lawyer, and i find this particular case ridiculous too. But there are some incredibly anal retentive lawyers out there, who think it helps their clients, when in actuality it hurts them. --Dan