From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28812 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2003 22:25:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28788 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2003 22:25:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web13803.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.175.13) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2003 22:25:56 -0000 Message-ID: <20031205222554.70148.qmail@web13803.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.59.142.117] by web13803.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 05 Dec 2003 14:25:54 PST Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 22:25:00 -0000 From: Mark Newman Subject: Re: Apple's async changes To: Jason Molenda Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <6C197134-2764-11D8-9FBF-000393D457E2@apple.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00122.txt.bz2 I'm sorry Jason - I know that it appears ridiculous but the attorney that I talked to made it clear that I could only use something from the FSF. I am sorry that I am causing such a problem but I have to follow the rules that they are laying down for me. Beleive me that I also think that this is ridiculous - that is what lawyers do. Please help me out - I would like to leverage off of Apple's stuff for async. If what has already been delivered is the bulk of the changes then I will live with that. However I would very much like to have current code. I am sorry that this is working out this way - please bear with me. Mark Newman --- Jason Molenda wrote: > By the way, in case anyone didn't have the > instructions handy, here's > the page about the Apple public cvs server: > > http://developer.apple.com/darwin/tools/cvs/howto.html > > In short, do > > cvs -d > :pserver:anonymous@anoncvs.opensource.apple.com:/cvs/root > login > ("anonyous") > cvs -z3 -d > :pserver:anonymous@anoncvs.opensource.apple.com:/cvs/root > co > gdb > > Jason > > On Dec 4, 2003, at 3:17 PM, Mark Newman wrote: > > > > > Would it be possible for Apple to provide a > current > > snap of their version of gdb? > > > > The current snaps are old and I would like to > reflect > > some of their work into async. > > > > Mark Newman > > >