Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dan@dberlin.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let dwarf2 CFI's execute_stack_op be used outside of CFI
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <np8z8esyob.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203261739120.12362-100000@dberlin.org>


Daniel Berlin <dan@dberlin.org> writes:
> On 26 Mar 2002, Jim Blandy wrote:
> > Actually, Daniel, I'm sorry --- I've re-read the change more
> > carefully, and I've gotten more confused than I was before.
> > 
> > You've changed the Dwarf 2 location expression evaluator to consult
> > the current register values --- not the values of the registers with
> > respect to a specific stack frame.  I can't think of any situations in
> > which this the correct behavior.  Can you explain more about the
> > contexts in which this change is useful?  It seems to me that it's
> > wrong in most of the cases I can think of.  It really needs to take a
> > frame argument, or at the very least, read registers from the selected
> > frame (although that's kind of gross and global-variable-ish).
> 
> Whoops.
> You're right.
> I must have merged it while on crack or something.
> I *meant* to add the frame argument, and only require *either* the 
> context argument (Which is what it currently takes, a CFA context)  or the 
> frame, but it looks like I messed up.
> 
> What it *should* look like is closer to the one from the WIP i sent. It 
> should call get_saved_register with the frame argument if the context is 
> null, or get_reg with the context argument if the context is not null.

Okay --- that makes more sense.

I started reviewing the WIP, but I got interrupted.  Do you want to
extract something from that and post it as a non-WIP patch?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-03-26 23:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-25 15:57 Daniel Berlin
2002-03-25 16:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-25 16:21   ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-26  7:52     ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-26  9:49     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-26  9:52       ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-26 11:09       ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-26 12:06         ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-03-26 17:59           ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-27  0:09             ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-03-27  6:24               ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-27  6:32                 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-03-26 18:06       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-27 20:56         ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-26  9:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-26  9:49   ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-26 11:59 ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-26 13:42 ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-26 14:43   ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-26 14:53     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-26 15:26       ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-26 17:09         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-26 17:18           ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-26 18:12             ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-26 18:19               ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-26 18:26                 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-26 15:21     ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2002-03-26 19:17       ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-28 13:12         ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-28 13:32           ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-28 15:31             ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-29 17:06               ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-01 11:00                 ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-02  6:59                   ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-02 11:28                     ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-02 11:31                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-02 11:46                         ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-02 11:57                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-02 13:12                             ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-02 13:15                               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-02 11:47                       ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-02 18:55                       ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-02 21:02                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-03 13:05                           ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-03 14:12                             ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-03 12:58                         ` Stan Shebs
2002-04-03 18:59                 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-02  6:50               ` Petr Sorfa
2002-04-02  6:56                 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-02  8:19                   ` [PATCH] Let dwarf2 CFI's execute_stack_op be used outside ofCFI Petr Sorfa
2002-04-04 12:24               ` [PATCH] Let dwarf2 CFI's execute_stack_op be used outside of CFI Daniel Berlin
2002-04-04 12:30                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-04 13:11                 ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-28 15:03           ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-27  7:50   ` Petr Sorfa
2002-03-27  8:09     ` Daniel Berlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=np8z8esyob.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com \
    --to=jimb@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan@dberlin.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox