Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	"Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,
	        Jan Kratochvil <jkratoch@redhat.com>
Subject: Multi-exec patches (Was: [rfc] Infrastructure to disable breakpoints during inferior startup)
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3iqhhog41.fsf_-_@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3my6tohy0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Fri\, 24 Jul 2009 16\:05\:27 -0600")

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:

Tom> I still haven't actually tried it, but I hope to do so soon.

I tried it a little.

I can't remember ... should this all work ok on x86 Linux?  I thought
yes, hence this report, but if not, feel free to just let me know and
ignore all this.

Most of what I've written here seems familiar.  I assume I read it all
in earlier notes of yours :-)


The first thing I noticed is that the new features are off by default.
I had to:

    set schedule-multiple on
    set detach-on-fork off

to get it to work.  Having it disabled by default is ok as long as it is
a "technology preview", but if we think it is very solid then I think we
should enable it by default.

Having to set 2 options is obscure.  I suppose I didn't really need to
set both, except my first attempt was to run "make", which tripped over
the vfork problem.


I put a gcc I built into my $PATH.  Then I did:

    $ cd gdbserver
    $ ../gdb make

Then I tried various things.

"run clean" worked ok!  That was cool!

Then I exited gdb and restarted it and tried a plain "run".  This gave
me:

    (gdb) set schedule-multiple on
    (gdb) set detach-on-fork off
    (gdb) run
    Starting program: /usr/bin/make 
    (no debugging symbols found)
    (no debugging symbols found)
    (no debugging symbols found)
    [New process 3931]
    process 3931 is executing new program: /bin/true
    (no debugging symbols found)
    (no debugging symbols found)
    (no debugging symbols found)

    Program exited normally.

... which is a little odd, since no build was done.
And, what's with process 3931 executing /bin/true?
Am I not debugging the 'make' process?

A minor nit: I think "is executing a new program" would read better.

Then I did "run clean":

    (gdb) run clean
    Starting program: /bin/true clean
    (no debugging symbols found)
    (no debugging symbols found)
    gcc -c -Wall -g3    -I. -I../../../archer/gdb/gdbserver -I../../../archer/gdb/gdbserver/../common -I../../../archer/gdb/gdbserver/../regformats -I../../../archer/gdb/gdbserver/../../include ../../../archer/gdb/gdbserver/regcache.c

Here, for some reason, the compile started.  And, gdb forgot that I was
looking at "make" and ran /bin/true.

At this point, gdb hangs and cannot be interrupted.  I kill -9'd it.


If I do the above but remember "file /usr/bin/make", gdb starts make
again ok and the compile starts.  But, gdb hangs again as above.

This hang occurs often enough that I couldn't get to other tests, like
trying to set a breakpoint that would only trigger in cc1.


Those "(no debugging symbols found)" messages made me want Doug's patch
more ;)


Note that it is entirely possible that the patch applied strangely and I
introduced some bug that way.  Or, maybe there is some other pilot
error.

Tom


  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-24 22:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-22 17:14 [rfc] Infrastructure to disable breakpoints during inferior startup Ulrich Weigand
2009-07-22 20:32 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-23 15:49   ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-07-23 16:51     ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-23 18:06       ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-07-23 18:57         ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-24 22:49           ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-24 23:32             ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2009-07-25 16:05               ` Multi-exec patches (Was: [rfc] Infrastructure to disable breakpoints during inferior startup) Pedro Alves
2009-07-25 19:31                 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-27 17:39                 ` Multi-exec patches Tom Tromey
2009-07-27 18:45                   ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-28 14:28                   ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-29 22:03                     ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-31 15:45           ` [rfc] Infrastructure to disable breakpoints during inferior startup Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-03  3:07             ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2009-08-03 18:13               ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-05 18:14                 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-05 18:58                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-06 17:46                   ` Tom Tromey
2009-08-06 18:42                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-06 19:12                       ` Michael Snyder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3iqhhog41.fsf_-_@fleche.redhat.com \
    --to=tromey@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jkratoch@redhat.com \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox