From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,
"Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jkratoch@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Multi-exec patches (Was: [rfc] Infrastructure to disable breakpoints during inferior startup)
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907251628.51203.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907251612.50134.pedro@codesourcery.com>
On Saturday 25 July 2009 16:12:49, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > (gdb) set schedule-multiple on
> > (gdb) set detach-on-fork off
> > (gdb) run
> > Starting program: /usr/bin/make
> > (no debugging symbols found)
> > (no debugging symbols found)
> > (no debugging symbols found)
> > [New process 3931]
> > process 3931 is executing new program: /bin/true
> > (no debugging symbols found)
> > (no debugging symbols found)
> > (no debugging symbols found)
> >
> > Program exited normally.
> >
> > ... which is a little odd, since no build was done.
> > And, what's with process 3931 executing /bin/true?
I noticed I didn't exactly respond to this one.
> > Am I not debugging the 'make' process?
Yes you are, but, 'make' vforked (notice the [New process...] message,
and then execed /bin/true. You only see the "Attaching after fork..."
message with "info verbose on" (linux-nat.c:linux_child_follow_fork).
If you do "info inferiors" or "info sspaces", you should see you're
debugging both /usr/bin/make and /bin/true simultaneously at this point.
> Ah, but you're debugging in all-stop mode. What this means
> is that a program exit is a reason to stop everything and report
> to the user. This was /bin/true exiting. Check "info inferiors",
> and you should still see other inferiors there, waiting for you
> to tell them to continue execution.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-25 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-22 17:14 [rfc] Infrastructure to disable breakpoints during inferior startup Ulrich Weigand
2009-07-22 20:32 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-23 15:49 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-07-23 16:51 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-23 18:06 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-07-23 18:57 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-24 22:49 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-24 23:32 ` Multi-exec patches (Was: [rfc] Infrastructure to disable breakpoints during inferior startup) Tom Tromey
2009-07-25 16:05 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-25 19:31 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2009-07-27 17:39 ` Multi-exec patches Tom Tromey
2009-07-27 18:45 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-28 14:28 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-29 22:03 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-31 15:45 ` [rfc] Infrastructure to disable breakpoints during inferior startup Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-03 3:07 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2009-08-03 18:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-05 18:14 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-05 18:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-06 17:46 ` Tom Tromey
2009-08-06 18:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-06 19:12 ` Michael Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907251628.51203.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jkratoch@redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox