From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, thiago.bauermann@gmail.com (Thiago Jung Bauermann),
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pedro@codesourcery.com,
jkratoch@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfc] Infrastructure to disable breakpoints during inferior startup
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3ab2dgcht.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908051814.n75IED4s005139@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (Ulrich Weigand's message of "Wed\, 5 Aug 2009 20\:14\:13 +0200 \(CEST\)")
Ulrich> I'll be happy to add documentation to gdbint.texinfo, but I'm
Ulrich> not quite sure where to start.
It seems to me that in many cases the documentation would be more
helpful if it were near the things it documented.
For example, consider all the text in gdbint.texinfo concerning
cleanups. It is quite useful to read when one is new to GDB; I've
pointed several people at it. However, I think that if it were comments
near the declarations of cleanup functions in a header file, I probably
would not have to point people to it -- they would read it naturally as
a consequence of looking up calls to make_cleanup.
Also, it is simpler to remember to require changes to comments near the
code than to gdbint.texinfo.
I think there is still a need for an internals document, because there
are things worth documenting that don't have a natural location in a
source file. I'm thinking of things like coding conventions, HIG
guidelines for new commands, etc -- things that affect future decisions
but that are not inherent in the code.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-06 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-22 17:14 Ulrich Weigand
2009-07-22 20:32 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-23 15:49 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-07-23 16:51 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-23 18:06 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-07-23 18:57 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-24 22:49 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-24 23:32 ` Multi-exec patches (Was: [rfc] Infrastructure to disable breakpoints during inferior startup) Tom Tromey
2009-07-25 16:05 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-25 19:31 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-27 17:39 ` Multi-exec patches Tom Tromey
2009-07-27 18:45 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-28 14:28 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-29 22:03 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-31 15:45 ` [rfc] Infrastructure to disable breakpoints during inferior startup Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-03 3:07 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2009-08-03 18:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-05 18:14 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-05 18:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-06 17:46 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2009-08-06 18:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-06 19:12 ` Michael Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3ab2dgcht.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jkratoch@redhat.com \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=thiago.bauermann@gmail.com \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox